ArticleBMC oral health2025
An index system for the clinical supervision of clear aligner in extraction patients based on the Delphi method and the analytic hierarchy process.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical supervision of clear aligner treatment in extraction patients is essential during the long process of follow-up period. However, there is insufficient clinical guidance available to define the key points of a standard examination for clinical supervision.
methodsAn initial index system was constructed based on a comprehensive literature review. The final indexes to be used in the system were determined through Delphi process. Weightings for the final index system were determined using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which required the development of a judgment matrix to assess the relative significance of each index through pairwise comparisons.
resultsA tiered indexing system was created, consisting of two primary indexes, 10 secondary indexes, and 30 tertiary indexes. The expert authority coefficient (Cr) was 0.89 for the first round of consultation and 0.91 for the second round. The weighting values for the first-level indexes 'tooth movement' and 'dentofacial health' were 0.38215 and 0.61785, respectively, thus indicating that dentofacial health holds greater importance.
conclusionsWe integrated both qualitative and quantitative analyses to establish a novel index system for clinical supervision of clear aligner treatment in extraction patients to reduce the incidence of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.