ReviewBMC urology2025
Giant angiomyofibroblastoma of the scrotum: a case report and review of the literature.
Review in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Angiomyofibroblastoma of the scrotum: A report of two cases and literature review.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn angiomyofibroblastoma (AMF) is a rare tumor that primarily occurs in the vulva of women. AMF rarely occurs in the inguinal region and scrotum of men. CASE PRESENTATION: A 59-year-old male was admitted to the hospital for evaluation of left scrotal enlargement for 2 years. A physical examination revealed no elevation in the bilateral renal or suprapubic region. The bladder was located below the pubic bone and was non- tender without pressure. Auscultation revealed no abnormalities in the right or left renal regions. The left scrotum was enlarged with a palpable mass measuring 25 × 15 cm in size. The mass was characterized by a tough, smooth surface with a clear boundary. The left testis was not palpable and the transillumination test result was negative. Magnetic resonance imaging included an abnormal signal in the scrotum, which was consistent with a space-occupying germ cell tumor but other diagnoses could not be ruled out. The preoperative preparation indicated no contraindications to surgery. Under lumbar anesthesia, the left scrotal lesion was resected. The postoperative pathologic evaluation confirmed an AMF. Currently, the patient has recovered fully without complications.
conclusionA large-sized AMF is relatively rare in the male scrotum, but reported in this case. A scrotal AMF often has an oval shape with no palpable pain. Imaging techniques can facilitate the hypervascular status of an AMF and pathologic findings can establish the diagnosis. However, reports of scrotal AMF are limited. A more thorough understanding should be achieved with additional cases and long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.