Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40325401›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025

Evaluating the coverage of sexually transmitted infection prevention and control services in eight districts in Central Uganda: lot quality assurance sampling survey.

Simon Peter Katongole, Semei Christopher Mukama, Jane Nakawesi, Dedrix Stephenson Bindeeba, Simons Ezajobo, Susan Nakubulwa, Andrew Mugisa, Mary Odiit, Catherine Senyimba, Eve Namitala and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Simon Peter KatongoleGudie University Project, P.O. Box 27450, Kampala, Uganda. spkatongole@gmail.com.
Semei Christopher MukamaMildmay Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Jane NakawesiMildmay Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Dedrix Stephenson BindeebaMildmay Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Simons EzajoboMildmay Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Susan NakubulwaMildmay Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Andrew MugisaMildmay Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Mary OdiitMildmay Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Catherine SenyimbaMildmay Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Eve NamitalaMildmay Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Robert D D M Onzima AnguyoLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Department of International Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Barbara MukasaMildmay Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a major global public health problem, associated with infertility, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and significant social and economic burdens. These challenges are particularly severe in underprivileged communities. A 2024 World Health Organisation report highlighted a global surge in STIs, requiring intensified efforts to improve their control and management. In order to appropriately respond and reverse the status quo, it is important to understand the extent to which the current interventions have reached the beneficiaries. This study aimed to assess the coverage of sexually transmitted infection (STI) services using the Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) approach in eight districts of Central Uganda. METHODOLOGY: A household survey was conducted in eight districts, targeting four population groups: mothers of children aged 0-11 months, women aged 15-49 years, men aged 15 + years, and youth aged 15-25 years. LQAS was used, with each district stratified into five supervision areas (SAs). In each SA, 19 respondents were randomly sampled from each target group. The survey assessed key indicators related to STIs, including knowledge of STI symptoms, knowledge of actions to take when infected with an STI, and engagement in risky sexual behavior. The study also examined condom use during risky sex, circumcision acceptance and non-acceptance among men, including reasons for its acceptance or non-acceptance. Overall and district-specific coverage was calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Indicator coverage in the SAs was classified using LQAS decision rules (DRs) for each indicator, using the overall coverage as benchmark for setting the DR.

resultsThe findings revealed that mothers of children aged 0-11 months demonstrated superior knowledge of STIs and appropriate actions to take if one has an STI. Men (15 + years) and youth (15-24 years) reported engaging more in risky sexual behavior compared to women 15-49 years and mothers of children aged 0-11 months. Relatedly, men 15 + years reported higher condom use during risky intercourse. Youth were more likely to be circumcised than older men. Coverage for most indicators varied across SAs and districts. However, one in forty of the SAs fell short of average coverage in all the indicators. Personal hygiene was the leading motivator for circumcision acceptance while fear of pain was the leading driver for refusal to accept being circumcised.

conclusionsThe findings highlight vital disparities in STI knowledge and risky sexual behavior among different demographic groups. These findings inform public health strategies to address STI disparities and improve reproductive health outcomes. District and SA-specific bottleneck analysis is recommended in order to provide actionable solutions to improve low-indicator coverage in low-coverage districts and SAs.

Indexed as

Sexually Transmitted DiseasesAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLot Quality Assurance SamplingMaleMiddle AgedUgandaYoung AdultCoverageLQASPreventionServicesSTIs/STDs

Identifiers

PMID40325401
PMCPMC12054300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.