ArticleBMC nursing2025
Perceived stress during resuscitation: a scale development study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Revision of the perceived parental-educational-anxiety scale and its application among Chinese college freshmen.PloS one · 2026Article
- From stress to success: using physiological data to predict cardiopulmonary resuscitation simulation performance.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConsidering that resuscitation is a very stressful situation, it is very important to use a tool to determine perceived stress during resuscitation. There is no valid and reliable measurement tool to examine perceived stress during resuscitation in Türkiye. The objective of this study was to develop the Perceived Stress During Resuscitation Scale for healthcare professionals who have an important role in resuscitation and to validate its psychometric properties among emergency nurses.
methodsBased on the literature review and expert review, a four-point Likert-type 52-item scale was prepared. Item analyses, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, concurrent and predictive validity and reliability studies were conducted to investigate the psychometric properties of the scale. Data were obtained from 348 emergency nurses registered in 11 hospitals in Turkey between August 2023 and October 2023.
resultsAfter confirmatory factor analysis, the scale consisting of 7 sub-dimensions (inadequate working conditions, ethical difficulties, insufficient authority, failed resuscitation effort, difficulties caused by patient relatives, emotional pressure caused by patient/patient relatives, unexpected situations) was finalized with 27 items. The Cronbach's α reliability coefficient of the scale was 0.891 and the values for the sub-dimensions ranged between 0.672 and 0.863.
conclusionsThe Perceived Stress During Resuscitation Scale is a valid and reliable measurement instrument for emergency nurses. The scale will enable the development of appropriate strategies by investigating the factors affecting perceived stress in nurses during resuscitation. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.