Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40325377›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Impact of generic antiretroviral drugs introduction on pharmaceutical expenditure patterns in the Netherlands: a six-year retrospective database analysis from 2016 to 2022.

P Oosterhof, M Van Luin, J W Vanhommerig, K Brinkman, D M Burger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

P OosterhofDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. piter.oosterhof@radboudumc.nl.
M Van LuinDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J W VanhommerigNivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
K BrinkmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
D M BurgerDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboudumc Research Institute for Medical Innovation (RIMI), Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the Netherlands, the annual expenditure on HIV care was reported as €202 million in 2019, with about 70% allocated to antiretroviral therapy (ART). The introduction of generic antiretroviral medications (ARVs) in 2017 has offered potential cost-saving opportunities in healthcare. Understanding the financial implications of incorporating generic ART into the Dutch healthcare system is crucial to determine its impact.

methodsWe used data from the Foundation for Pharmaceutical Statistics (SFK), covering 98% of all community and outpatient clinic pharmacies across the Netherlands. This dataset contained medication information from 2016 to 2022. Medication data were classified using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification with Defined Daily Dose (ATC/DDD) system. Cost analysis was based on Dutch drug prices ( www.medicijnkosten.nl ) for a specified period, and the data were processed using IBM SPSS.

resultsIn the Netherlands, people with HIV receiving ART increased from 20,072 to 24,573 between 2016 and 2022. HIV medication expenditure was €190 million euros in 2016, with generic medication at 6% DDDs. After an increase in 2017, a subsequent decrease in total HIV medication expenditure led to an overall cost of €181 million in 2022 (-5.1% compared to 2016). Simultaneously, the proportion of DDDs dispensed as a generic increased to 16-32% over the years. This could be linked to 97% compliance with generic substitutions for ARVs where a generic equivalent was available. Notably, the cost per patient per year has declined from €9,488 in 2016 to €7,352 in 2022 (-22.5% compared to 2016). Some of the potential cost-savings through generic substitution were not utilized because of the 20% point increase in the use of novel branded single-tablet regimens (STRs).

conclusionsOur analysis showed high compliance with generic substitution of ARVs in the Netherlands. The increased use of generic ARVs was accompanied by an almost 10% reduction in overall expenditure on ART despite a significant increase in the number of patients in care in the Netherlands during this period. A significant contributing factor to ART costs appears to be the high percentage of prescribed patented Single-Tablet Regimens (STRs). These findings underscore the complex dynamics of pharmaceutical expenditures in the Dutch healthcare system.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsAnti-Retroviral AgentsDrug CostsDrugs, GenericHealth ExpendituresHIV InfectionsDatabases, FactualHumansNetherlandsRetrospective StudiesAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Retroviral AgentsDrugs, GenericAntiretroviral therapyCost of careCost-savingEconomic evaluationGeneric antiretroviral therapyHIVPharmaceutical expenditureThe Netherlands

Identifiers

PMID40325377
PMCPMC12051263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.