ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
Outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy of a normally appearing appendix in children with suspected acute appendicitis: a tertiary care center experience.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a lack of consensus among pediatric surgeons regarding the optimal management of a macroscopically normal appendix encountered during laparoscopy in children with suspected acute appendicitis. We hereby present our experience with laparoscopic appendectomy for macroscopically normal appendix in children with suspected acute appendicitis, evaluating its efficacy, safety, and postoperative histopathological findings of the excised specimens.
methodsThis retrospective study was conducted on 221 children with acute right lower quadrant abdominal (RLQA) pain and had a high clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis between January 2018 and January 2022. Among these, 38 patients were found to have a macroscopically normal appendix during surgery. All patients underwent appendectomy, and the excised specimens were sent for histopathological examination.
resultsFollowing laparoscopic appendectomy for macroscopically normal appendices in 38 children with suspected acute appendicitis, histopathological examination revealed pathological changes in 32 specimens (84%). Catarrhal appendicitis was identified in 26 cases (68%), fecalith obstruction in 5 cases (13%), and phlegmonous appendicitis in 1 case (3%), while only 6 specimens (16%) were histologically normal. The mean operative time was 51 min, with no conversions to open surgery. Postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients (5%), including one case of hyperpyrexia and one wound infection, both managed conservatively. The average hospital stay was 23.9 h, with 89% of patients discharged within 24 h. Postoperatively, all patients had complete RLQA pain resolution, with no complications or symptom recurrence during the three-month follow-up.
conclusionOur study supports appendectomy in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopy for suspected acute appendicitis when no other pathology is identified, even if the appendix appears normal. This approach is justified with low morbidity, short hospital stays, symptom resolution without recurrence and only 16% of normal-looking appendices confirmed as histologically normal. However, larger multi-centre studies are needed to validate and standardize this practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.