ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2026
Buccal application of microneedles coated with an optimized hydrogel containing naproxen and dexamethasone.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polymer Microneedles for Localized Drug Delivery in Musculoskeletal Tissue Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Targeted repair of oral mucosal injury: emerging applications of biomaterials-based drug delivery systems.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inflammation and impaired bone regeneration are major challenges in oral and maxillofacial surgery, necessitating the development of effective drug delivery systems. This study aimed to develop a hydrogel-based microneedle (MN) system for the controlled release of anti-inflammatory and osteogenic drugs. A hydrogel loaded with naproxen sodium (NAS) and dexamethasone sodium phosphate (DEX) using poloxamer 407 (NDgel) was prepared using a low-temperature method and optimized via the Box-Behnken design. The optimized hydrogel exhibited a gelation temperature of 30.87 ± 0.64℃, pH 7.92 ± 0.12, and viscosity 87.47 ± 5.66 cP. Physicochemical evaluations, including differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), confirmed that NAS and DEX were incorporated in an amorphous form. The hydrogel was coated onto microneedles (NDgMN) via a dip-coating method and dried. In vitro drug release studies in artificial saliva showed NAS and DEX release rates of 21.7 ± 5.8% and 19.0 ± 1.8%, respectively, after 5 min. The NDgMN exhibited significantly enhanced permeability, with 48.5% and 48.7% permeability for NAS and DEX after 48 h, compared to 31.0% and 28.8% for the hydrogel alone. The IC
Indexed as
Identifiers
40325306What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.