ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2025
Enhancing mortality prediction in intensive care units: improving APACHE II, SOFA, and SAPS II scoring systems using long short-term memory.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exploring an AI-driven dynamic triage system for real-time patient risk reassessment in emergency departments in low-resource settings.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- A multicenter machine learning model for predicting ICU mortality in mechanically ventilated patients: development and external validation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Predicting ICU in-hospital mortality from text-encoded structured EHR data using adaptive transformer layer fusion.iScience · 2026Article
- Review
- Dynamic Parameters within the First 72 H of ICU Admission Predict Extubation Failure and 28-Day Mortality in Severe Pneumonia-Induced ARDS: A Retrospective Cohort Study.The clinical respiratory journal · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting chronic critical illness in ICU patients with acute pancreatitis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Serum inflammatory biomarkers can predict clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis-associated gastrointestinal dysfunction.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning for early detection of carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Predictive modeling for mortality risk in elderly patients with pulmonary embolism using machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of machine learning-based prediction for in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia and respiratory failure.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in acute respiratory distress syndrome management: recent advances.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional scoring systems, such as APACHE II, SOFA, and SAPS II, predict ICU mortality using logistic regression (LR) models based on the worst values of time-series variables. This methodology often disregards temporal dynamics, limiting predictive accuracy. This study aimed to enhance mortality prediction in ICU patients by utilizing Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) algorithms, which capture the full temporal information from time-series data collected within the first 24 h of ICU admission. A total of 1336 ICU patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV database were included in this study. Time-series variables from the APACHE II, SOFA, and SAPS II scoring systems during the initial 24 h of each patient were collected retrospectively to develop LSTM-based prediction models for hospital mortality. Three distinct data representations were employed for each scoring system: (1) original hourly data over the 24-h period, (2) categorized hourly data derived from the cutoff points defined in the scoring systems, and (3) total scores calculated on an hourly basis. These data representations were used as inputs for separate LSTM models. Model performance was evaluated using a range of metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and Brier score. The LSTM-optimized models significantly outperformed LR model using conventional scoring systems. For APACHE II, the LSTM model achieved an AUC of 0.898 compared to 0.777 for LR (P < 0.001). Similarly, the SOFA and SAPS II LSTM models achieved AUCs of 0.861 and 0.897, respectively, compared to 0.715 (P < 0.001) and 0.708 (P = 0.004) for their LR counterparts. While all three LSTM models performed well, the model utilizing original hourly values consistently demonstrated the highest accuracy, particularly for APACHE II (P = 0.021). Incorporating time-series data into LSTM-based prediction models significantly improves the accuracy of ICU mortality prediction compared to traditional LR-based scoring systems. This approach has the potential to redefine clinical decision support tools in critical care settings by leveraging temporal dynamics in patient data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40325281What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.