Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40325281›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2025

Enhancing mortality prediction in intensive care units: improving APACHE II, SOFA, and SAPS II scoring systems using long short-term memory.

Yuhan Deng, Shihai Li, Jiaxing Li, Xinya Tao, Yang Li, Chong You, Xiaohua Zhou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuhan DengChongqing Research Institute of Big Data, Peking University, Chongqing, 401121, China.ORCID 0009-0001-2436-6299
Shihai LiChongqing Research Institute of Big Data, Peking University, Chongqing, 401121, China.
Jiaxing LiChongqing Research Institute of Big Data, Peking University, Chongqing, 401121, China.
Xinya TaoChongqing Research Institute of Big Data, Peking University, Chongqing, 401121, China.
Yang LiChongqing Research Institute of Big Data, Peking University, Chongqing, 401121, China. yang.li@cqbdri.pku.edu.cn.
Chong YouChongqing Research Institute of Big Data, Peking University, Chongqing, 401121, China. chongy@fudan.edu.cn.
Xiaohua ZhouChongqing Research Institute of Big Data, Peking University, Chongqing, 401121, China. xiaohua.zhou@cqbdri.pku.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 12401377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional scoring systems, such as APACHE II, SOFA, and SAPS II, predict ICU mortality using logistic regression (LR) models based on the worst values of time-series variables. This methodology often disregards temporal dynamics, limiting predictive accuracy. This study aimed to enhance mortality prediction in ICU patients by utilizing Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) algorithms, which capture the full temporal information from time-series data collected within the first 24 h of ICU admission. A total of 1336 ICU patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV database were included in this study. Time-series variables from the APACHE II, SOFA, and SAPS II scoring systems during the initial 24 h of each patient were collected retrospectively to develop LSTM-based prediction models for hospital mortality. Three distinct data representations were employed for each scoring system: (1) original hourly data over the 24-h period, (2) categorized hourly data derived from the cutoff points defined in the scoring systems, and (3) total scores calculated on an hourly basis. These data representations were used as inputs for separate LSTM models. Model performance was evaluated using a range of metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and Brier score. The LSTM-optimized models significantly outperformed LR model using conventional scoring systems. For APACHE II, the LSTM model achieved an AUC of 0.898 compared to 0.777 for LR (P < 0.001). Similarly, the SOFA and SAPS II LSTM models achieved AUCs of 0.861 and 0.897, respectively, compared to 0.715 (P < 0.001) and 0.708 (P = 0.004) for their LR counterparts. While all three LSTM models performed well, the model utilizing original hourly values consistently demonstrated the highest accuracy, particularly for APACHE II (P = 0.021). Incorporating time-series data into LSTM-based prediction models significantly improves the accuracy of ICU mortality prediction compared to traditional LR-based scoring systems. This approach has the potential to redefine clinical decision support tools in critical care settings by leveraging temporal dynamics in patient data.

Indexed as

APACHEHospital MortalityOrgan Dysfunction ScoresAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveAPACHE IIICULSTMPrognostic predictionSAPS IISOFA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.