Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40325270›Full record

ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2025

Molecular Diagnosis to IgE-mediated Wheat Allergy and Wheat-Dependent Exercise-Induced Anaphylaxis.

Witchaya Srisuwatchari, Kantima Kanchanapoomi, Punchama Pacharn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Witchaya SrisuwatchariDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkoknoi, 10700, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kantima KanchanapoomiDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkoknoi, 10700, Bangkok, Thailand.
Punchama PacharnDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkoknoi, 10700, Bangkok, Thailand. punchama@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2507-2057

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IgE-mediated wheat allergy is an emerging problem worldwide, particularly prevalent in Northern Europe and parts of Asia. Another unique manifestation of wheat allergy, wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA), and hydrolyzed wheat protein-induced urticaria/anaphylaxis/WDEIA, has increasingly been reported in recent decades. Major wheat protein allergens are classified into two main categories: water/salt-soluble proteins (e.g., alpha-amylase inhibitors, lipid transfer proteins (LTP), and avenin-like proteins) and alcohol/diluted acid-soluble proteins (e.g., gliadins and glutenins). The most allergenic wheat proteins responsible for IgE-mediated wheat allergy are gliadins, particularly omega (ω)-5-gliadin, and glutenins. In cases of WDEIA, ω-5-gliadin and LTP have been identified as the major allergens involved. Diagnostic challenges for IgE-mediated wheat allergy and WDEIA exist due to the variable sensitivity and specificity of currently available tests, including skin prick tests (SPT) and serum-specific IgE (sIgE), which may lead to misdiagnosis. These variations in diagnostic value may be attributed to factors such as clinical presentation, the specific allergens involved, the type of SPT extracts used, and the component tested. Additionally, in countries where grass pollen is a primary sensitizer, in vivo or in vitro cross-reactivity between timothy grass and wheat is common. However, this cross-reactivity is usually asymptomatic and lacks clinical significance. Diagnostic methods have been developed to minimize the risks associated with oral food challenge tests (OFC). Novel approaches, including component-resolved diagnostics (CRD), basophil activation tests (BAT), and epitope-specific antibody assays, provide more precise diagnostic options for IgE-mediated wheat allergy, WDEIA, and its subtypes by targeting specific allergens and components. However, further large-scale studies and validations are required to standardize these diagnostic protocols.

Indexed as

AllergensAnaphylaxisExerciseImmunoglobulin ETriticumWheat HypersensitivityAntigens, PlantExercise-Induced AllergiesGliadinHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPlant ProteinsSkin TestsAllergensAntigens, PlantGliadinImmunoglobulin EPlant ProteinsAnaphylaxisComponent-resolved diagnosisDiagnosisWheat allergy

Identifiers

PMID40325270
PMCPMC12052925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.