Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40325249›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma : Current classification and biopsy diagnostics].

M Andrulis

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M AndrulisInstitut für Pathologie, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen am Rhein gGmbH, 67063, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Deutschland. andrulism@klilu.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical/methodological issueImaging plays a central role in the staging and biopsy-based diagnosis of malignant lymphomas. The diagnostic approach using core needle biopsy requires an interdisciplinary strategy that integrates clinical, histopathological and molecular characteristics of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsUltrasound and/or computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: The current WHO classification defines over 40 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma entities, taking the genomic heterogeneity into account. PERFORMANCE/ACHIEVEMENTS: This review focuses on non-Hodgkin's lymphomas with imaging-based diagnostic relevance, including indolent and aggressive B‑NHL as well as systemic T/NK-NHL. It also discusses technical aspects of core needle biopsy and treatment-related effects that can impact the biopsy quality. Special attention is paid to the role of imaging and biopsy techniques in detecting high-grade transformation of indolent B‑NHL, which is associated with rapid progression and diagnostic challenges. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Ultrasound-guided and CT-guided core needle biopsies are well-established standard procedures with a high sensitivity. Close interdisciplinary collaboration between radiology and pathology, along with structured communication of clinical information are essential to ensure high diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Image-Guided BiopsyLymphoma, Non-HodgkinBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedCore needle biopsyHigh-grade transformationMalignant lymphomaTherapy-related changesWHO classification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.