Observational studyAnnals of hematology2025
Venous thromboembolic risk in hematological hospitalized patients: a retrospective study.
Observational study in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Onco-Hem Connectome-Network-Based Phenotyping of Polypharmacy and Drug-Drug Interactions in Onco-Hematological Inpatients.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Acute heart failure in patients with hematologic malignancies: A nationwide analysis 2016-2021.SAGE open medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although patients with hematological malignancies carry a non-negligible risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTE), no risk assessment models (RAMs) have been developed and validated to predict this risk during their hospital stay. Moreover, the performance of RAMs developed to predict the thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk in hospitalized medical patients has never been assessed in this specific population. In this observational study we sought to assess the incidence of VTE and hemorrhagic events (HE), to evaluate pharmacological prophylaxis use, and to test existing RAMs for TE and HE (Padua Predictions Score, PPS, and Improve Bleeding Score, IBS, respectively) in a population of 514 hematological patients at their first hospital admission. 165 patients were found to be at high thromboembolic and 114 at high hemorrhagic risk according to PPS and IBS; a total of 148 patients received pharmacological prophylaxis with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH). An incidence of VTE (3.11%) and HE (1.75%) was found, with most thrombotic (15/16) and hemorrhagic (8/9) events occurring in patients not receiving prophylaxis. At the univariate analysis, the diagnosis of acute leukemia was significantly associated with an increased risk of VTE, whereas prophylaxis was found to be protective. However, at the multivariate analysis the statistical significance was lost for both of these variables (HR = 2.76, p = 0.218 and HR = 0.22, p = 0.170, respectively). PPS poorly performed in this population, but no other factors associated with VTE were found. Larger, multicenter studies to develop better RAMs tailored to HM patients are needed to improve VTE management in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.