Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40325234›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Object representations drive emotion schemas across a large and diverse set of daily-life scenes.

Chuanji Gao, Susan Ajith, Marius V Peelen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chuanji GaoSchool of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China. chuanji.gao@njnu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5080-2675
Susan AjithDepartment of Medicine, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Gießen, Germany.
Marius V PeelenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. marius.peelen@donders.ru.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4026-7303

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32300863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid emotional evaluation of objects and events is essential in daily life. While visual scenes reliably evoke emotions, it remains unclear whether emotion schemas evoked by daily-life scenes depend on object processing systems or are extracted independently. To explore this, we collected emotion ratings for 4913 daily-life scenes from 300 participants, and predicted these ratings from representations in deep neural networks and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activity patterns in visual cortex. AlexNet, an object-based model, outperformed EmoNet, an emotion-based model, in predicting emotion ratings for daily-life scenes, while EmoNet excelled for explicitly evocative scenes. Emotion information was processed hierarchically within the object recognition system, consistent with the visual cortex's organization. Activity patterns in the lateral occipital complex (LOC), an object-selective region, reliably predicted emotion ratings and outperformed other visual regions. These findings suggest that the emotional evaluation of daily-life scenes is mediated by visual object processing, with additional mechanisms engaged when object content is uninformative.

Indexed as

EmotionsVisual CortexVisual PerceptionAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40325234
PMCPMC12053605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.