Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40325229›Full record

ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[How does the preoperative waiting time affect hospital mortality and complication rates in geriatric patients with medial femoral neck fractures?]

Annette Keß, Johanna Krauße, Philipp Pieroh, Christian Kleber, Johannes Fakler, Georg Osterhoff

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annette KeßKlinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum AöR Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland. annette.kess@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7009-2261
Johanna KraußeKlinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum AöR Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Philipp PierohKlinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum AöR Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Christian KleberKlinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum AöR Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Johannes FaklerKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum Passau, Passau, Deutschland.
Georg OsterhoffKlinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum AöR Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current guidelines of the German Federal Joint Committee on the treatment of proximal femoral fractures require that patients with a proximal femoral fracture receive surgical treatment as soon as possible and within 24 h of admission. This is intended to reduce perioperative complication rate and mortality.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to analyze the hospital mortality as well as complication rates and types in relation to the preoperative waiting time. METHODOLOGY: From 2010 to 2020, a total of 575 patients with femoral neck fractures treated with a bipolar prosthesis were retrospectively analyzed with respect to hospital mortality and the occurrence of complications. Patients with pathological fractures, femoral neck fractures more than 4 weeks old and those treated with osteosynthesis were excluded. Patient-specific data, hospital mortality and complication rates and types were recorded.

resultsDuring the study period, the implementation of the given guidelines resulted in a reduction in the preoperative waiting time from a median of 38 h in 2010 to 19 h in 2020. Surgical treatment was performed on average after 14.2 h in patients who had surgery within 24 h after admission and on average after 40.2 h for those who had surgery after 24 h. The average American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score for all 575 patients was 2.76. The group of patients who had surgery after more than 24 h had a significantly higher ASA classification (p = 0.024). A total of 12 (4.2%) patients in the group surgically treated within 24 h died, compared to 24 (8.5%) deaths in the group surgically treated after 24 h (p = 0.035). The complication rate for the entire cohort was 15% (88 patients). There was no difference in the occurrence of complications and the overall complication rate with respect to the timing of surgery.

conclusionDuring the study period the preoperative waiting time was halved from 39h to 19 h. Patients who were surgically treated within 24 h had a significantly lower hospital mortality than those surgically treated after 24 h; however, the group surgically treated after 24 h simultaneously showed higher baseline comorbidities and in the adjusted analysis for age and ASA score, the 24‑h threshold no longer emerged as an independent risk factor for hospital mortality. Regarding complication rates, no significant differences were found between the groups based on the timing of surgery.

Indexed as

Femoral Neck FracturesHospital MortalityPostoperative ComplicationsTime-to-TreatmentWaiting ListsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGermanyHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsGeriatricsHemiarthroplastyMortalityProximal femoral neck fracturesTrauma surgery

Identifiers

PMID40325229
PMCPMC12310750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.