SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Nonsurgical Temple Volumization with Soft-Tissue Fillers: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Filler Injection Between the Superficial and Deep Temporal Fascia and Diameter of Superficial Temporal Arteries for Temple Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Pooled it
- Dangerous Anatomical Zones in Terms of Vascular Structures for Filler Injections to the Temporal Region: A Morphometric CT Angiography Study.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFacial aging leads to cosmetically unappealing volume loss in the temples. We systematically reviewed the available literature regarding nonsurgical temporal volumization with injectable fillers.
methodsOn Sept 16, 2024, Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases were queried with relevant terms for all articles describing temporal volumization with injectable fillers, including those with temple-specific data within the context of full-face volumization. Studies unrelated to temporal volumization, using autologous fat or its derivatives, limited to temporal lifting via injection into the temporoparietal scalp, without novel clinical/patient data, or unavailable in English were excluded.
resultsDatabase query yielded 680 unique articles. One additional article was found with citation searching. After screening and evaluation for duplicates and inclusion/exclusion criteria, 40 articles were included. Nineteen studies were prospective and 21 studies were retrospective, of which 9 were complication case reports. A total of 881 patients were treated with either hyaluronic acid (n = 783), calcium hydroxylapatite (n = 93), polymethylmethacrylate (n = 28), allograft adipose matrix (n = 10), and poly-L-lactic acid (n = 2). Pooled data demonstrated improvement in temporal hollowing and global aesthetic improvement scales, as well as subject satisfaction. Pain/tenderness/pressure (29.6%), ecchymosis (17.3%), and edema (15.5%) were the most common posttreatment adverse events. Vascular events and other serious adverse events were rare. Deeper (supraperiosteal or inter/intra-fascial) injection may be more commonly associated with masticatory pain/discomfort.
conclusionsTemporal volume loss is a natural consequence of aging that can be safely and effectively improved with soft-tissue fillers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40325223What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.