Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40325148›Full record

Observational studyBritish journal of cancer2025

Prognostic significance of circulating tumor DNA alterations in advanced renal cell carcinoma from SCRUM-Japan MONSTAR-SCREEN: a nationwide genomic profiling project.

Taigo Kato, Masaki Shiota, Koshiro Nishimoto, Nobuaki Matsubara, Takahiro Osawa, Takashige Abe, Yota Yasumizu, Nobuyuki Tanaka, Yoshiyuki Yamamoto, Yu Ishizuya and 9 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Current Status and Future Perspectives of Molecular Residual Disease Testing in Genitourinary Cancers.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Taigo KatoDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. taigo.kato@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8681-1407
Masaki ShiotaDepartment of Urology, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Science, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3306-4858
Koshiro NishimotoDepartment of Uro-Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Nobuaki MatsubaraDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Takahiro OsawaDepartment of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Takashige AbeDepartment of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Yota YasumizuDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1725-6454
Nobuyuki TanakaDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiyuki YamamotoDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yu IshizuyaDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hikaru AbutaniChugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideaki BandoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Takao FujisawaTranslational Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Yoshiaki NakamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5241-6855
Mototsugu OyaDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuo ShinoharaDepartment of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Masatoshi EtoDepartment of Urology, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Science, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takayuki YoshinoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0489-4756
Norio NonomuraDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6522-6233

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising tool for diagnosing and predicting cancer prognosis. However, its clinical utility in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains unclear, particularly in terms of clinical prognosis.

methodsWe enrolled 124 patients with mRCC in the MONSTAR-SCREEN study (UMIN 000036749) between August 2019 and February 2022, a national observational ctDNA-based screening study, and performed ctDNA sequencing before and at the time of resistance to systemic therapy.

resultsctDNA were assessed in 178 samples containing 432 mutations. The most frequently altered genes at baseline were VHL (25.0%), PBRM1 (10.9%), TERT2 (8.7%), BAP1 (8.7%), and MTOR (7.6%). Patients receiving first-line therapy with tumor fraction (TF) < 1.2% showed significantly better progression-free survival than those with TF ≥ 1.2% (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.467; 95% CI 0.229-0.979; p = 0.0425). BAP1 mutational status of ctDNA at baseline led to poor OS (HR = 0.4867; 95% CI 0.322-0.736; p = 0.0003). Serial ctDNA analysis showed that 46.8% of patients developed new ctDNA mutations at disease progression, which was linked to shorter time to progression (p = 0.046).

conclusionsOur findings demonstrated that ctDNA profiling is feasible in mRCC and can predict disease progression after treatment.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellCirculating Tumor DNAKidney NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedMutationPrognosisTumor Suppressor ProteinsUbiquitin ThiolesteraseBAP1 protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNATumor Suppressor ProteinsUbiquitin Thiolesterase

Identifiers

PMID40325148
PMCPMC12238367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.