ArticleScientific reports2025
Cognitive bias in generative AI influences religious education.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of DeepSeek's perceived interactivity on medical students' self-directed learning ability.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Research on factors affecting trust formation of generative AI agents in human-AI interaction contexts.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the transformative role of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in shaping religious cognition, with particular emphasis on its implications for religious education. By examining the biases inherent in AI-generated content, this research highlights how these biases influence user perceptions and interactions with diverse religious teachings. Through experimental frameworks and pre/post-interaction evaluations, the study reveals that generative AI not only reflects but amplifies cognitive biases, affecting users' understanding of religious doctrines and cultural diversity. The findings underscore the potential of generative AI to act as a double-edged sword in religious education: enhancing personalized learning and cross-cultural understanding while risking the reinforcement of prejudice. These insights call for ethical guidelines and oversight mechanisms in deploying generative AI within religious contexts. This research contributes to the growing discourse on AI ethics and its pivotal role in shaping inclusive and unbiased religious education in the digital era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.