Observational studyScientific reports2025
Evaluation of nutritional intake and malnutrition in critically ill patients and its relationship with 28-day death.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic nutritional indices and functional outcome in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Applying gastric residual volume as one of the indicators for enteral feeding intolerance: A scoping review.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2026Review
- Nutritional Risk and 30-Day In-Hospital Mortality in Adults With Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malnutrition and risk for malnutrition in critically ill patients are associated with adverse outcomes. However, the adequacy of nutrient intake and its impact on malnutrition have not been entirely determined in previous studies. Above all, this study investigates the relationship between some nutrient intake and malnutrition levels and 28-day death. The observational study was done on patients over 18 years of age in Rafsanjan Intensive Care Unit (ICU) from April 21 to October 24, 2022. Subjective global assessment (SGA), modified nutrition risk in critically Ill (mNUTRIC) Score, demographic details and intake of some nutrients were assessed. Data was analyzed with SPSS 22 software, and a p-value of 0.05 was a significant level for all analysis.118 patients were studied. Malnutrition and mNUTRIC score are linked to 28-day mortality in logistic regression analysis (OR: 3.63, 95%CI 1.48-8.91, p = 0.004 and OR: 12.69, 95%CI 4.42-36.43, p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference between the intake of some nutrients and malnutrition/ risk for malnutrition. This study reveals no relevance between nutrient intake with malnutrition and risk for malnutrition. Moreover, in malnourished patients, some nutrient intake was unrelated to the 28-day death. It is suggested that future studies be done with a larger sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.