ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparison of clinical outcomes of polyetheretherketone and hybrid resin crowns placed on molars for over two years.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fracture load analysis of telescopic overdentures fabricated from PEEK and zirconia.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the 2-year clinical outcomes of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and hybrid resin crowns placed on molars. Patients who received PEEK (P-Cr) and hybrid resin (H-Cr) crowns at Hiroshima University Hospital between 2016 and 2021 were evaluated in 2024 for crown conditions, including loss, fractures, and occlusal wear. No cases of crown debonding or fracture were observed in the P-Cr group. In contrast, the H-Cr group had 10 cases of loss and 4 cases of fractures. The P-Cr group demonstrated significantly fewer cases of crown debonding than the H-Cr group. Occlusal wear was observed in most crowns in the P-Cr group. Compared to the hybrid resin crowns, the PEEK crowns had a lower risk of fracture and debonding and retained long-term functionality; however, surface roughness and color changes were observed, suggesting that they may not be ideal for patients with particularly high esthetic demands. Nevertheless, physiological occlusal relationships and functionality were preserved, indicating that PEEK crowns could be a viable option for restoring molar defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.