Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40325044›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An efficient patient's response predicting system using multi-scale dilated ensemble network framework with optimization strategy.

Nalini Manogaran, Nirupama Panabakam, Durai Selvaraj, Koteeswaran Seerangan, Firoz Khan, Shitharth Selvarajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nalini ManogaranDepartment of CSE, S.A. Engineering College (Autonomous), Chennai, 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
Nirupama PanabakamDepartment of CSE, VEMU Institute of Technology, Chitoor, 517112, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Durai SelvarajDepartment of CSE, School of Computing, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, 600062, Tamil Nadu, India.
Koteeswaran SeeranganDepartment of CSE (AI and ML), S.A. Engineering College (Autonomous), Chennai, 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
Firoz KhanCentre for Information and Communication Sciences, Ball State University, Muncie, USA.
Shitharth SelvarajanDepartment of Computer Science, Kebri Dehar University, 250, Kebri Dehar, Ethiopia. ShitharthS@kdu.edu.et.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The forecasting of a patient's response to radiotherapy and the likelihood of experiencing harmful long-term health impacts would considerably enhance individual treatment plans. Due to the continuous exposure to radiation, cardiovascular disease and pulmonary fibrosis might occur. For forecasting the response of patients to chemotherapy, the Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) technique is widely used. With the help of radiotherapy, cancer diseases are diagnosed, but some patients suffer from side effects. The toxicity of radiotherapy and chemotherapy should be estimated. For validating the patient's improvement in treatments, a patient response prediction system is essential. In this paper, a Deep Learning (DL) based patient response prediction system is developed to effectively predict the response of patients, predict prognosis and inform the treatment plans in the early stage. The necessary data for the response prediction are collected manually. The collected data are then processed through the feature selection segment. The Repeated Exploration and Exploitation-based Coati Optimization Algorithm (REE-COA) is employed to select the features. The selected weight features are input into the prediction process. Here, the prediction is performed by Multi-scale Dilated Ensemble Network (MDEN), where we integrated Long-Short term Memory (LSTM), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and One-dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks (1DCNN). The final prediction scores are averaged to develop an effective MDEN-based model to predict the patient's response. The proposed MDEN-based patient's response prediction scheme is 0.79%, 2.98%, 2.21% and 1.40% finer than RAN, RNN, LSTM and 1DCNN, respectively. Hence, the proposed system minimizes error rates and enhances accuracy using a weight optimization technique.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsHumansPrognosisLong-short term memoryMulti-scale dilated ensemble networkOne-dimensional convolutional neural networksPatient’s response predictionRecurrent neural networkRepeated exploration and exploitation-based coati optimization algorithm

Identifiers

PMID40325044
PMCPMC12052969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.