Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40325041›Full record

ArticleNPJ vaccines2025

Elicitation of liver-stage immunity by nanoparticle immunogens displaying P. falciparum CSP-derived antigens.

Mark D Langowski, Joseph R Francica, Alex L Roederer, Nicholas K Hurlburt, Justas V Rodarte, Lais Da Silva Pereira, Barbara J Flynn, Brian Bonilla, Marlon Dillon, Patience Kiyuka and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Mark D LangowskiInstitute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Joseph R FrancicaVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Alex L RoedererInstitute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nicholas K HurlburtVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Justas V RodarteVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lais Da Silva PereiraVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Barbara J FlynnVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Brian BonillaVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Marlon DillonVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Patience KiyukaVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Rashmi RavichandranInstitute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Connor WeidleVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lauren CarterInstitute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mangala RaoHenry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Gary R MatyasHenry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Marion PepperDepartment of Immunology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Azza H IdrisVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Robert A SederVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Marie PanceraVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. mpancera@fredhutch.org.
Neil P KingInstitute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. neilking@uw.edu.

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-009411Gates Foundation INV-010680National Science Foundation DGE-1762114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vaccine that provides robust, durable protection against malaria remains a global health priority. Although a breakthrough in the fight against malaria has recently been achieved by the licensure of two vaccines based on the circumsporozoite protein (CSP), the effectiveness and durability of protection can still be improved. Both vaccines contain a portion of CSP that does not include epitopes targeted by recently identified, potently protective monoclonal antibodies, suggesting that newer immunogens can expand the breadth of immunity and potentially increase protection. Here we explored >100 alternative CSP-based immunogens and evaluated the immunogenicity and protection of a large number of candidates, comparing several to the licensed R21 vaccine. The data highlight several general features that improve the stability and immunogenicity of CSP-based vaccines, such as inclusion of the C-terminal domain and high-density display on protein nanoparticle scaffolds. We also identify antigen design strategies that do not warrant further exploration, such as synthetic repeat regions that include non-native repeat cadences. The benchmark R21 vaccine outperformed our best immunogen for immunogenicity and protection. Overall, our data provide valuable insights on the inclusion of junctional region epitopes that will guide the development of potent and durable vaccines against malaria.

Identifiers

PMID40325041
PMCPMC12053698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.