ArticleScientific reports2025
Sarcopenia worsens overall survival following robotic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robot-assisted versus thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: long-term oncological and functional outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Nutritional prehabilitation strategies in abdominal surgery.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026Review
- The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and pulmonary function predict non-esophageal cancer-related mortality after esophagectomy.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2026Article
- The predictive role of PNI and NRS2002 for postoperative pulmonary complications in ESCC patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy followed by McKeown esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sarcopenia is a recognized independent risk factor associated with poor outcomes in cancer patients undergoing surgery. Patients with esophageal cancer are particularly susceptible to sarcopenia due to multiple factors. Purpose of the current study was to investigate the effect of sarcopenia on outcome and survival in patients undergoing full-robotic esophagectomy. This study includes all patients who underwent full-robotic abdominothoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between January 2019 and December 2022. The skeletal muscle index, assessed by the preoperative computed tomographic staging scan, was used to classify the study cohort into a sarcopenic and a non-sarcopenic group. A total of 206 cases were included. With 168 patients (82%), prevalence of sarcopenia was high in the study population. The proportion of older (65.3 vs. 60.7 years, p = 0.0115), male (86% vs. 72%, p = 0.0469) and patients with tumor stenosis and/or dysphagia after completion of neoadjuvant therapy (71% vs. 44%, p = 0.0035) in the sarcopenic group was significantly higher than in the non-sarcopenic group. Sarcopenia did not affect short-term outcomes including complication rates. However, overall- (17.4 vs. 22.8 months, p = 0.0458) and disease-free survival (15.3 vs. 22.6 months, p = 0.0069) was significantly reduced in sarcopenic patients. Preoperative sarcopenia was not associated with altered short-term outcomes but reduced overall- and disease-free survival. These findings underscore the critical need for prehabilitation and nutritional support for sarcopenic patients undergoing full-robotic esophagectomy, a complex procedure with inherently high morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.