ArticleNature communications2025
GelGenie: an AI-powered framework for gel electrophoresis image analysis.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influenza A deletion-containing viral genome production is altered by metabolites, metabolic signaling molecules, and cyanobacterial extracts.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Advancements in Ultrasound Gel Pad Technologies: Enhancing Diagnostic Precision, Procedural Efficiency, and Therapeutic Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Base modifications shift tertiary structure and activity in synthetic RNA origami and a natural ribozyme.Nature communications · 2026Article
- DNAvi: integration, statistics, and visualization of cell-free DNA fragment traces.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- GelGenie: an AI-powered framework for gel electrophoresis image analysis.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gel electrophoresis is a ubiquitous laboratory method for the separation and semi-quantitative analysis of biomolecules. However, gel image analysis principles have barely advanced for decades, in stark contrast to other fields where AI has revolutionised data processing. Here, we show that an AI-based system can automatically identify gel bands in seconds for a wide range of experimental conditions, surpassing the capabilities of current software in both ease-of-use and versatility. We use a dataset containing 500+ images of manually-labelled gels to train various U-Nets to accurately identify bands through segmentation, i.e. classifying pixels as 'band' or 'background'. When applied to gel electrophoresis data from other laboratories, our system generates results that quantitatively match those of the original authors. We have publicly released our models through GelGenie, an open-source application that allows users to extract bands from gel images on their own devices, with no expert knowledge or experience required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.