Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40324901›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2025

Noninvasive ventromedial prefrontal cortex stimulation can enhance and impair affective learning from rewarding and threatening stimuli.

Thomas Kroker, Maimu Alissa Rehbein, Miroslaw Wyczesany, Kati Roesmann, Ida Wessing, Markus Junghöfer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas KrokerInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Muenster, Malmedyweg 15, Muenster, Northrhine-Westphalia 48149, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8040-0076
Maimu Alissa RehbeinOtto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Fliednerstraße 21, Muenster, Northrhine-Westphalia 48149, Germany.
Miroslaw WyczesanyFaculty of Philosophy, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Ingardena 6, Krakow 30-060, Poland.
Kati RoesmannOtto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Fliednerstraße 21, Muenster, Northrhine-Westphalia 48149, Germany.
Ida WessingInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Muenster, Malmedyweg 15, Muenster, Northrhine-Westphalia 48149, Germany.
Markus JunghöferInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Muenster, Malmedyweg 15, Muenster, Northrhine-Westphalia 48149, Germany.

Funding

Dfg JU 445/10-3 JU 445/9-1Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research of the University of Muenster Ju2/024/15Polish National Science Center UMO-2018/31/G/HS6/02490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) is known as a central hub involved in affective learning from appetitive/aversive stimuli, as demonstrated in numerous studies examining affective stimuli. We used vmPFC-stimulation to test whether the concept of enhanced affective learning applies to enhanced inhibition of risky decisions and overgeneralized fear. Therefore, we modulated vmPFC-excitability noninvasively via transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) using excitatory, inhibitory, and sham stimulation. We re-analysed previously published behavioural and magnetoencephalography data trial-wise to test whether improved learning is the mechanism underlying modulated gambling/fear generalization. Following excitatory vs. sham stimulation, participants gambled more rationally and got better at discriminating safe from threatening stimuli, as indicated by interactions between tDCS and gambling/fear stimuli. Three-way interactions with trial-number suggest that these improvements developed during the experiment. In contrast, in the inhibitory group, these abilities deteriorated over the paradigm. The neural data dovetailed with behavioural effects, in that neural correlates of modulated learning after stimulation also developed over time. Our results indicate an association between vmPFC activity and the ability to learn from appetitive/aversive stimuli. As impaired affective learning is a driving mechanism in mental disorders, these findings identify excitatory vmPFC-tDCS as a potential treatment, especially in combination with psychotherapy.

Indexed as

AffectFearLearningPrefrontal CortexRewardTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultFemaleGamblingHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleYoung Adultaffective learningEEGMEGtranscranial direct current stimulationventromedial prefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID40324901
PMCPMC12097488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.