Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40324709›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2025

Not the same as it ever was: A review of memory modification, updating, and distortion in humans and rodents.

Chad A Brunswick, Catherine M Carpenter, Nancy A Dennis, Janine L Kwapis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sex-specific role of microglia in ΔNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The cognitive neuroscience of memory representations.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chad A BrunswickDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, 208 Life Sciences Building, 432 Science Drive, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Catherine M CarpenterDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, 441 Moore Building, 138 Fischer Road, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Nancy A DennisDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, 441 Moore Building, 138 Fischer Road, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Janine L KwapisDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, 208 Life Sciences Building, 432 Science Drive, University Park, PA 16802, USA. Electronic address: jlk855@psu.edu.

Funding

Psychosocial Determinants and Biological Pathway to Healthy Aging (Pathways)T32AG049676 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI LYNN M. MARTIRE · 2016 to 2026
$3.9M
Diurnal control of memory allocation by the circadian gene Per1R01AG074041 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI JANINE LYNN KWAPIS · 2022 to 2026
$1.5M
Epigenetic and cellular mechanisms of age-related memory updating impairmentsF31AG087533 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI BRUNSWICK, CHAD ARTHUR · 2024 to 2025
$75k
NIA NIH HHS F31 AG087533NIA NIH HHS R01 AG074041NIA NIH HHS T32 AG049676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory is a reconstructive and continuous process that enables existing information to be modified in response to a changing environment. Being able to dynamically update outdated memories is critical to an organism's survival. Memory modifications have been extensively studied in both rodents and humans, and prior work has revealed many regional, cellular, neurotransmitter, and subcellular molecular mechanisms underlying this process. However, these diverse bodies of literature have not yet been fully integrated into a comprehensive cross-species review. Integrating the finding across rodent and human work is important for furthering our understanding of memory modifications and the underlying neural mechanisms that support memory modification in both species. Here, we discuss advances in our understanding of adaptive and maladaptive memory modifications in terms of both underlying mechanisms (regional, cellular, and molecular) and behavioral outcomes. By emphasizing findings from both humans and rodents, the two major model systems in which memory modifications have been studied, we are able to highlight converging mechanisms and point to open questions in the field. Specifically, we discuss the major findings from several memory paradigms including declarative, aversive and procedural memory designs and highlight paradigms and models that have been readily translated between rodent and human models. Ultimately, this review identifies key parallels underlying memory updating across species, paradigms, tasks, and models.

Indexed as

BrainMemoryNeuronal PlasticityAnimalsHumansRodentiaFalse memoriesMemory modificationMemory updatingReconsolidation

Identifiers

PMID40324709
PMCPMC12125627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.