ArticleAppetite2025
High satiety: Evaluating determinants of energy compensation and intake in multiple preloading studies.
Article in Appetite, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effects of food properties on satiety can be evaluated by having individuals consume a compulsory first-course preload before an ad libitum test meal. One measure of satiety is energy compensation, which can be quantified as total meal energy intake (preload + test meal) expressed as a percentage of an individual's energy intake at a no-preload control meal. In this secondary analysis, we evaluated characteristics of preloads, test meals, and participants that predict energy compensation, in order to inform methods for satiety assessment. We combined data from 13 preloading studies comprising weighed intakes from 1757 preload meals across 511 participants. The results showed that energy compensation was positively influenced by preload energy and energy density, and negatively influenced by preload weight (all p < 0.0001). Energy compensation was not, however, affected by characteristics of the test meal or the participants. The strongest predictor of energy compensation was the energy content of the preload relative to an individual's control meal energy intake, which explained 32 % of the variability in the outcome. Complete energy compensation was observed when preload energy averaged 27 % of control meal intake. The finding that relative preload energy was the strongest predictor of compensation underscores the importance of including a control condition in preloading studies. This allows researchers to focus on the effects of preload properties by adjusting for any influential characteristics of the test meal and participants. Understanding predictors of energy compensation can be used to improve methods for satiety assessment and to facilitate interpretation of findings from preloading studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.