Trial reportHormone research in paediatrics2026
Somapacitan Is Effective and Well Tolerated in Chinese Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency: A Randomized Controlled Phase 3 Study.
Trial report in Hormone research in paediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04970654 (A Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Once Weekly Dosing of Somapacitan With Daily Norditropin® in Chinese Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Once Weekly Dosing of Somapacitan With Daily Norditropin® in Chinese Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Long-acting growth hormone for treating growth hormone deficiency in children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials focusing on changes in body mass index.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- Weekly long-acting growth hormone versus daily growth hormone therapy on quality of life, efficacy, and safety in children with short stature: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Long-Acting Growth Hormone Versus Daily Growth Hormone for Growth Hormone Deficiency Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2026Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Somapacitan versus Daily Growth Hormone in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency: A Pooled Analysis of Randomised Trial Data.Hormone research in paediatrics · 2026Article
- Can long-acting growth hormone improve adherence in pediatric growth hormone deficiency?Endocrine · 2026Review
- Seven-year Safety and Efficacy of Somapacitan in Children With GH Deficiency: Final Results From REAL 3.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionREAL6 is a randomized, multi-centre, open-labelled, active-controlled parallel group phase 3 trial (NCT04970654) investigating once-weekly somapacitan, a reversible albumin-binding growth hormone (GH) derivative, in Chinese children with GH deficiency (GHD).
methods110 treatment-naïve patients were randomized 2:1 to somapacitan (0.16 mg/kg/week) or daily GH (Norditropin®; 0.034 mg/kg/day) for 52 weeks. Annualized height velocity (HV; cm/year) at week 52 was the primary measurement. Additional assessments included HV standard deviation score (SDS), height SDS (HSDS), bone age, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) SDS, and observer-reported outcomes.
resultsEstimated mean HV at week 52 was 11.0 and 10.4 cm/year for somapacitan and daily GH, respectively. Non-inferiority of somapacitan compared to daily GH was confirmed. Changes in HVSDS, HSDS, bone age, and IGF-I SDS from baseline to week 52 were similar between groups. At week 52, mean (SD) IGF-I SDS was within intended reference range (-2.0 to +2.0) and comparable between groups: +0.5 (1.4) for somapacitan versus +0.1 (1.2) for daily GH. Somapacitan was well tolerated with a safety profile consistent with the well-known safety profile of daily GH. A low proportion of injection site reactions were reported for somapacitan (2.7%), with no reports of injection site pain during the 52-week treatment period. Disease burden was reduced from baseline to week 52 for both treatments. Somapacitan reduced treatment burden compared to daily GH.
conclusionsEfficacy and safety profiles were comparable for Chinese children with GHD treated with somapacitan or daily GH. Both treatments similarly reduced disease burden, while treatment burden was reduced with somapacitan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.