Trial reportAnesthesiology2025
Sugammadex for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade in Neonates and Infants Less than 2 Years Old: Results from a Phase IV Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03909165 (A Phase 4 Double-blinded, Randomized, Active Comparator-controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Sugammadex), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 4 Double-blinded, Randomized, Active Comparator-controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Sugammadex (MK-8616) for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade in Pediatric Participants Aged Birth to <2 Years
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Use, Monitoring and Reversal of Neuromuscular Block in Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional ESAIC Survey.Paediatric anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Association Between Adherence to a Locally Adapted Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway and Perioperative Outcomes After Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Error Traps in Pediatric Neuromuscular Block.Paediatric anaesthesia · 2026Review
- [Muscle relaxation 2026-50 years of searching for the ideal relaxant].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2026Review
- The utility of sugammadex in infants: a shifting clinical paradigm.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Toward reliable neuromuscular blockade reversal using sugammadex in infants: insights from a phase IV trial.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Development of the neuromuscular junction and neuromuscular blocking agents in neonates, infants and children: A narrative review.European journal of anaesthesiology · 2026Review
- Safety and Efficacy of Using Sugammadex in Pediatric Patients: A Narrative Review.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Sugammadex for reversing neuromuscular blockade in infants and children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSugammadex is well tolerated and effective for reversing neuromuscular blockade (NMB) in adults and children as young as 2 yr old. There is little information on its use in younger children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of sugammadex in children under 2 yr of age.
methodsThis was a phase IV, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter clinical trial of sugammadex in participants aged birth to less than 2 yr (NCT03909165). Part A was open label and included pharmacokinetic assessments to determine whether sugammadex dose adjustment for part B was necessary based on age. Part B was double-blind and evaluated doses of 2 and 4 mg/kg sugammadex. Participants were randomized to (1) moderate NMB and reversal with 2 mg/kg sugammadex; (2) moderate NMB and reversal with neostigmine + glycopyrrolate or atropine (hereafter, called neostigmine); or (3) deep NMB and reversal with 4 mg/kg sugammadex. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to neuromuscular recovery (TTNMR). The primary efficacy hypothesis was that 2 mg/kg sugammadex would be superior to neostigmine for the reversal of moderate NMB as measured by TTNMR in part B.
resultsA total of 138 participants aged 1 to 720 days were treated in parts A and B (2 mg/kg sugammadex, n = 44; 4 mg/kg sugammadex, n = 63; and neostigmine, n = 31). Based on pharmacokinetic assessments in part A, no dose adjustments for age were needed. In part B, TTNMR for reversal of moderate NMB was faster with 2 mg/kg sugammadex than neostigmine (median of 1.4 min vs. 4.4 min; hazard ratio, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.37 to 4.18; P = 0.0002). A 4-mg/kg dose of sugammadex achieved rapid TTNMR for reversal of deep NMB with a median of 1.1 min (parts A and B). The percentage of participants with one or more adverse events (parts A and B) was similar for sugammadex and neostigmine. No deaths, drug-related serious adverse events, or hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis events were reported.
conclusionsIn children less than 2 yr old, 2 mg/kg sugammadex reversed moderate NMB faster than neostigmine, and 4 mg/kg sugammadex rapidly reversed deep NMB. Sugammadex doses of 2 and 4 mg/kg were well tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.