Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40324165›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Developing a Scalable Annotation Method for Large Datasets That Enhances Alarms With Actionability Data to Increase Informativeness: Mixed Methods Approach.

Sophie Anne Inès Klopfenstein, Anne Rike Flint, Patrick Heeren, Mona Prendke, Amin Chaoui, Thomas Ocker, Jonas Chromik, Bert Arnrich, Felix Balzer, Akira-Sebastian Poncette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sophie Anne Inès KlopfensteinInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8470-2258
Anne Rike FlintInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1414-5812
Patrick HeerenInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9356-2296
Mona PrendkeInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0602-9691
Amin ChaouiInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2527-4783
Thomas OckerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9252-6294
Jonas ChromikDigital Health - Connected Healthcare, Hasso-Plattner-Institute, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5709-4381
Bert ArnrichDigital Health - Connected Healthcare, Hasso-Plattner-Institute, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8380-7667
Felix Balzer *Institute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1575-2056
Akira-Sebastian Poncette *Institute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4627-7016

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlarm fatigue, a multifactorial desensitization of staff to alarms, can harm both patients and health care staff in intensive care units (ICUs), especially due to false and nonactionable alarms. Increasing amounts of routinely collected alarm and ICU patient data are paving the way for training machine learning (ML) models that may help reduce the number of nonactionable alarms, potentially increasing alarm informativeness and reducing alarm fatigue. At present, however, there is no publicly available dataset or process that routinely collects information on alarm actionability (ie, whether an alarm triggers a medical intervention or not), which is a key feature for developing meaningful ML models for alarm management. Furthermore, case-based manual annotation is too slow and resource intensive for large amounts of data.

objectiveWe propose a scalable method to annotate patient monitoring alarms associated with patient-related variables regarding their actionability. While the method is aimed to be used primarily in our institution, other clinicians, scientists, and industry stakeholders could reuse it to build their own datasets.

methodsThe interdisciplinary research team followed a mixed methods approach to develop the annotation method, using data-driven, qualitative, and empirical strategies. The iterative process consisted of six steps: (1) defining alarm terms; (2) reaching a consensus on an annotation concept and documentation structure; (3) defining physiological alarm conditions, related medical interventions, and time windows to assess; (4) developing mapping tables; (5) creating the annotation rule set; and (6) evaluating the generated content. All decisions were made based on feasibility criteria, clinical relevance, occurrence frequency, data availability and quantity, structure, and storage mode. The annotation guideline development process was preceded by the analysis of the institution's data and systems, the evaluation of device manuals, and a systematic literature review.

resultsIn a multidisciplinary consensus-based approach, we defined preprocessing steps and a rule-based annotation method to classify alarms as either actionable or nonactionable based on data from the patient data management system. We have presented our experience in developing the annotation method and provided the generated resources. The method focuses on respiratory and medication management interventions and includes 8 general rules in a tabular format that are accompanied by graphical examples. Mapping tables enable handling unstructured information and are referenced in the annotation rule set.

conclusionsOur annotation method will enable a large number of alarms to be labeled semiautomatically, retrospectively, and quickly, and will provide information on their actionability based on further patient data. This will make it possible to generate annotated datasets for ML models in alarm management and alarm fatigue research. We believe that our annotation method and the resources provided are universal enough and could be used by others to prepare data for future ML projects, even beyond the topic of alarms.

Indexed as

Clinical AlarmsHumansIntensive Care UnitsMachine Learningalarm fatiguealarm informativenessalarm managementdataset annotationdigital healthintensive care unitmachine learningpatient-centered carepatient monitoringtechnological innovationtransdisciplinary research

Identifiers

PMID40324165
PMCPMC12089878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.