Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40324116›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2025

Personalized Circulating Tumor DNA Testing for Detection of Progression and Treatment Response Monitoring in Patients With Metastatic Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast.

Julia Foldi, Steffi Oesterreich, Antony Tin, Samuel Rivero-Hinojosa, Janie Fielder, Jenifer Ferguson, Giby V George, Ekaterina Kalashnikova, Angel A Rodriguez, Minetta C Liu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Julia FoldiUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-7504-867X
Steffi OesterreichUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-2537-6923
Antony TinNatera, Inc, Austin, TX.
Samuel Rivero-HinojosaNatera, Inc, Austin, TX.
Janie FielderNatera, Inc, Austin, TX.
Jenifer FergusonNatera, Inc, Austin, TX.
Giby V GeorgeNatera, Inc, Austin, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-9731-5628
Ekaterina KalashnikovaNatera, Inc, Austin, TX.ORCID 0000-0003-1078-0656
Angel A RodriguezNatera, Inc, Austin, TX.ORCID 0000-0003-0735-3039
Minetta C LiuNatera, Inc, Austin, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-8206-5232
Adrian V LeeUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-9917-514X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite varying treatment responses and vastly different clinicopathologic characteristics, invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is treated similar to other subtypes of breast cancer. Serial personalized and tumor-informed, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis may enable real-time treatment monitoring in metastatic ILC (mILC).

methodsIn this retrospective analysis of real-world data, we analyzed ctDNA longitudinally in 66 patients with mILC using a clinically validated, personalized, tumor-informed 16-plex polymerase chain reaction-next generation sequencing assay (Signatera). We evaluated the predictive value on survival of a single ctDNA test result and correlated ctDNA detection rates and on-treatment ctDNA dynamics with disease status.

resultsA total of 355 plasma samples were analyzed from 66 patients with mILC (median age at diagnosis, 62.6 years [range, 32.2-79.7 years]). On treatment, ctDNA dynamics correlated well with clinical response to treatment as assessed by imaging. Ninety-two percent (11 of 12) of patients with either ctDNA decrease (6 of 6) or no change in ctDNA levels (5 of 6) while on treatment showed clinical benefit from their prescribed regimen, whereas only 31% (4 of 13) of patients who showed an increase in their ctDNA had a clinical benefit on imaging. Finally, patients with a positive ctDNA test showed a greater probability of death compared with those with negative results, and the positive predictive value of ctDNA testing continued to increase exponentially with each positive result. Similarly, a negative ctDNA result was associated with 97% overall survival at 6 months and remained high (approximately 90%) at the 12-month follow-up.

conclusionSerial ctDNA testing in patients with mILC is feasible and may enable personalized surveillance and real-time therapeutic monitoring.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, LobularCirculating Tumor DNAAdultAgedDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPrecision MedicineRetrospective StudiesCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID40324116
PMCPMC12058357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.