Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40324106›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2025

Benchmarking Quantum Gates and Circuits.

Vinay Tripathi, Daria Kowsari, Kumar Saurav, Haimeng Zhang, Eli M Levenson-Falk, Daniel A Lidar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vinay TripathiDepartment of Physics & Astronomy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1418-9046
Daria KowsariDepartment of Physics & Astronomy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States.
Kumar SauravCenter for Quantum Information Science and Technology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States.
Haimeng ZhangCenter for Quantum Information Science and Technology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States.
Eli M Levenson-FalkDepartment of Physics & Astronomy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0019-9465
Daniel A LidarDepartment of Physics & Astronomy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1671-1515

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate noise characterization in quantum gates and circuits is vital for the development of reliable quantum simulations for chemically relevant systems and fault-tolerant quantum computing. This paper reviews a variety of key benchmarking techniques, including Randomized Benchmarking, Quantum Process Tomography, Gate Set Tomography, Process Fidelity Estimation, Direct Fidelity Estimation, and Cross-Entropy Benchmarking. We evaluate each method's complexities, the resources they require, and their effectiveness in addressing coherent, incoherent, and state preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors. Furthermore, we introduce

Identifiers

PMID40324106
PMCPMC12203478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.