ArticleSystematic biology2025
PickMe: Sample Selection for Species Tree Reconstruction using Coalescent Weighted Quartets.
Article in Systematic biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
After collecting large datasets for phylogenomics studies, researchers must decide which genes or samples to include when reconstructing a species tree. Incomplete or unreliable datasets make the empiricist's decision more difficult. Researchers rely on ad hoc strategies to maximize sampling while ensuring sufficient data for accurate inferences. An algorithm called PickMe formalizes the sample selection process, assuming that the samples evolved under the tree Multispecies Coalescent Model. We propose a Bayesian framework for selecting samples for species tree analysis. Given a collection of gene trees, we compute a posterior probability for each quartet, describing the likelihood that the species tree displays this topology. From this, we assign individual samples reliability scores computed as the average of a scaled version of the posterior probabilities. PickMe uses these weights to recommend which samples to include in a species tree analysis. Analysis of simulated data showed that including the samples suggested by PickMe produced species trees closer to the true species trees than both unfiltered datasets and datasets with ad hoc gene occupancy cut-offs applied. To further illustrate the efficacy of this tool, we apply PickMe to gene trees generated from target capture data from milkweeds. PickMe indicates that more samples could have reliably been included in a previous milkweed phylogenomic analysis than the researchers analyzed without access to a formal methodology for sample selection. Using simulated and empirical data, we also compare PickMe to existing sample selection methods. Inclusion of PickMe will enhance phylogenomics data analysis pipelines by providing a formal structure for sample selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.