ArticlePloS one2025
Noise-Robust image edge detection based on multi-scale automatic anisotropic morphological Gaussian Kernels.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a novel multi-scale, noise-robust edge detection method that employs multi-scale automatic anisotropic morphological Gaussian kernels to extract edge maps from input images. It addresses the issue of cross-edge detection failure in the Canny edge detector. Compared to other edge detection methods, the proposed approach offers significant advantages in maintaining noise robustness while achieving high edge resolution and accuracy. The paper is structured into five key sections. First, we propose a multi-scale automatic anisotropic morphological directional derivative (AMDD) to capture local gray-level variations around each pixel at multiple scales. Second, a new fused edge strength map (ESM) is introduced based on the multi-scale AMDD. Third, we analyze why the Canny isotropic Gaussian kernel detector fails to detect cross edges. Additionally, the edge contour is extracted by incorporating the fused ESMs and the edge direction map (EDM), which are processed through spatial and directional matching filters, into the standard Canny detection framework. Finally, we evaluate the proposed method using precision-recall (PR) curves and Pratt's Figure of Merit (FOM). We compare its performance with existing state-of-the-art detectors on a standard dataset. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method effectively reduces noise, mitigates irrelevant signal interference, and smooths the image, showing competitive performance in edge detection tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.