ArticleBrazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery2025
Fate of Residual Aorta After Surgery for Type A Aortic Dissection.
Article in Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSurgical treatment of type A aortic dissection is essentially palliative. Many patients who undergo the procedure still have a dissection flap in the residual aorta, with a persistent patent or partially thrombosed false lumen leaving them susceptible to the dilatation of distal aorta and aneurysm formation.
methodsPatients who had undergone surgery for type A aortic dissection from January 2015 till December 2022 were recruited into the study. Two follow-up computed tomography scans were performed at least six months apart, the first one at least one month after the surgery.
resultsA persistent dissection flap was found in 34 (68%) patients. All segments of residual distal aorta showed dilatation with time. Growth rate was maximum for abdominal aorta - 3.1 (1.6 - 5.4) mm/year. Patency of false lumen was the only significant factor associated with growth of lower descending thoracic aorta and abdominal aorta (P<0.05). Maximum growth was seen in the patients with partial thrombosis of the false lumen, followed by those with patent false lumen. Two patients with partially thrombosed false lumens required reintervention in the form of endovascular stenting.
conclusionPatients after surgery for type A aortic dissection with partially thrombosed false lumens are more prone to aortic dilatation. Regular follow-up of these patients with computed tomography aortogram can lead to timely detection of these sequalae and intervention as needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.