ArticlePloS one2025
Semisupervised adaptive learning models for IDH1 mutation status prediction.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mutation status of isocitrate dehydrogenase1 (IDH1) in glioma is critical information for the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Accurately determining such information from MRI data has emerged as a significant research challenge in recent years. Existing techniques for this problem often suffer from various limitations, such as the data waste and instability issues. To address such issues, we present a semisupervised adaptive deep learning model based on radiomics and rough sets for predicting the mutation status of IDH1 from MRI data. Firstly, our model uses a rough set algorithm to remove the redundant medical image features extracted by radiomics, while adding pseudo-labels for non-labeled data via statistical. T-tests to mitigate the common issue of insufficient datasets in medical imaging analysis. Then, it applies a Sand Cat Swarm Optimization (SCSO) algorithm to optimize the weight of pseudo-label data. Finally, our model adopts U-Net and CRNN to construct UCNet, a semisupervised classification model for classifying IDH1 mutation status. To validate our models, we use a preoperative MRI dataset with 316 glioma patients to evaluate the performance. Our study suggests that the prediction accuracy of glioma IDH1 mutation status reaches 95.63%. Our experimental results suggest that the study can effectively improve the utilization of glioma imaging data and the accuracy of intelligent diagnosis of glioma IDH1 mutation status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.