Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40323991›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Semisupervised adaptive learning models for IDH1 mutation status prediction.

Fengning Liang, Yaru Cao, Teng Zhao, Qian Xu, Hong Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fengning LiangSchool of Medical Information and Engineering, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Yaru CaoSchool of Medical Information and Engineering, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Teng ZhaoSchool of Medical Information and Engineering, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Qian XuAffiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Hong ZhuSchool of Medical Information and Engineering, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1676-940X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mutation status of isocitrate dehydrogenase1 (IDH1) in glioma is critical information for the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Accurately determining such information from MRI data has emerged as a significant research challenge in recent years. Existing techniques for this problem often suffer from various limitations, such as the data waste and instability issues. To address such issues, we present a semisupervised adaptive deep learning model based on radiomics and rough sets for predicting the mutation status of IDH1 from MRI data. Firstly, our model uses a rough set algorithm to remove the redundant medical image features extracted by radiomics, while adding pseudo-labels for non-labeled data via statistical. T-tests to mitigate the common issue of insufficient datasets in medical imaging analysis. Then, it applies a Sand Cat Swarm Optimization (SCSO) algorithm to optimize the weight of pseudo-label data. Finally, our model adopts U-Net and CRNN to construct UCNet, a semisupervised classification model for classifying IDH1 mutation status. To validate our models, we use a preoperative MRI dataset with 316 glioma patients to evaluate the performance. Our study suggests that the prediction accuracy of glioma IDH1 mutation status reaches 95.63%. Our experimental results suggest that the study can effectively improve the utilization of glioma imaging data and the accuracy of intelligent diagnosis of glioma IDH1 mutation status.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningGliomaIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMutationAlgorithmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingIDH1 protein, humanIsocitrate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID40323991
PMCPMC12052117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.