Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40323961›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The psychometric properties of childhood physical and sexual abuse measures in two Canadian samples of youth and emerging adults.

Vanessa De Rubeis, Lil Tonmyr, Masako Tanaka, Tracie Afifi, Nicole Catherine, Ana Osorio, Harriet L MacMillan, Andrea Gonzalez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vanessa De RubeisDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Lil TonmyrCentre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Masako TanakaCentre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Tracie AfifiDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Nicole CatherineChildren's Health Policy Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ana OsorioDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Harriet L MacMillanDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Andrea GonzalezDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0087-830X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChild maltreatment is prevalent in Canada; how we measure it varies. The objective of the current study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Childhood Experiences of Violence Questionnaire Short Form (CEVQ-SF) physical and sexual abuse measures and of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) 2-item sexual abuse measure, compared with the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) in two samples of adolescents and young adults.

methodsRetrospective, self-reported child abuse history was collected in the British Columbia Healthy Connections Project (BCHCP) and in the Well-Being and Experiences (WE) Study. Internal consistency, criterion validity, and construct validity were examined.

resultsAcross both samples, the prevalence of child physical abuse (CPA) and child sexual abuse (CSA) ranged from 12.5% to 41.4% and from 5.8% to 34.3%, respectively. Internal consistencies were good-to-acceptable for CPA using the CEVQ-SF in the BCHCP (α = 0.83) and the WE Study (α = 0.79) and for CSA using the CEVQ-SF in the WE Study (α = 0.68). For CPA, in both studies, the highest agreement-moderate-to-fair-was between CEVQ-SF severe CPA and CTQ moderate CPA: κ=0.63 (BCHCP) and κ= 0.35 (WE Study). For CSA, agreement with CTQ moderate cut-offs was substantial in the BCHCP (κ=0.77) and fair in the WE Study (κ=0.37). DISCUSSION: Our findings support current and future use of the CEVQ-SF for CPA, and for CSA, using both the CEVQ-SF and the CCHS-CSA measure, given that they had good psychometric properties when administered to two samples of adolescents and young adults.

Indexed as

Child AbuseChild Abuse, SexualPsychometricsAdolescentAdultBritish ColumbiaCanadaChildFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceRetrospective StudiesSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40323961
PMCPMC12052104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.