ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2025
Effects of Hot Pepper Waste Powder on Meat Quail Performance, Carcass Yield, and Small Intestine Microflora.
Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In sustainable animal husbandry, wastes generated as a result of agricultural activities need to be evaluated for more effective animal feeding. The world generates approximately 1.2 billion tons of agricultural waste annually. This study aimed to investigate the impact of adding hot pepper waste powder (HPWP) to Japanese quail diets on performance, carcass characteristics, and small intestinal microflora. Each group consisted of 4 replications, with each replication consisting of 10 chicks. A total of 160-day-old meat Japanese quail were used in the study, which lasted for 42 days. The experimental groups: included a control group fed with standard feed and groups that had 100, 200, and 400 ppm HPWP added to the ration. At the end of the study, the average live body weights were determined as 275.39, 276.91, 276.15, and 285.92 g, respectively. The average feed intake in the last week was determined as 887.13, 907.33, 890.47, and 936.29 g, respectively. There was a significant increase in feed intake (p < 0.01-0.05) in all groups, especially during the growth period (at 2-5 weeks). As a result, while feed consumption and body weight increased in the HPWP added groups compared to the control, there was also a decrease in feed conversion. The study found statistically significant differences in cooking loss, breast L*, b*, chroma, and h° (p < 0.01), as well as leg L* and a* values of quail meat with the addition of HPWP (p < 0.05). The total bacterial count was 1.5, 15, 1.5, and 1.0 log10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.