ArticlePloS one2025
Quantification of soil inorganic carbon using sulfamic acid and gas chromatography.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergistic Effects of a Microbial Amendment and Crushed Basalt: Soil Geochemical and Microbial Responses.Global change biology · 2026Article
- Harnessing Microbes to Weather Native Silicates in Agricultural Soils for Scalable Carbon Dioxide Removal.Global change biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carbon dioxide is the primary greenhouse gas emitted through human activities, and these emissions impact the carbon cycle for hundreds to thousands of years. As carbon dioxide removal strategies to address this challenge continue to be explored and scaled, faster methodologies with high accuracy and precision are required to support the carbon measurements on which these strategies hinge. Of the many available methods to measure soil inorganic carbon, only a select few satisfy all the following criteria: measure inorganic carbon directly, use standardized equipment, perform the measurement automatically, and operate at high throughput. In this work we present a robust protocol for the sensitive and specific quantification of inorganic carbon from soils using gas chromatography to quantify carbon dioxide evolved from carbonates in soil with sulfamic acid. We demonstrate the precision of this method with purified carbonates, carbonate minerals, biogenic carbonates, and agricultural soil samples. We also demonstrate the accuracy of this method by adding known amounts of calcium carbonate to a variety of soil matrices. We find that sulfamic acid is well suited for carbonate dissolution and is compatible with gas chromatography applications, and we note that the method generates results that are equivalent to the typical methods used in this field. This method is compatible with automation and operation at a greater scale and enables the creation of higher resolution soil inorganic carbon datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.