ArticleDevelopmental psychology2025
Within-person imbalance of reward sensitivity and executive functioning across adolescent development: A longitudinal examination of the dual systems model from childhood to adulthood.
Article in Developmental psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex and pubertal stage as moderators of the association between resting-state connectivity of striatal circuitry and reward sensitivity in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Untangling relationships between cognitive development and child and adolescent mental health: Findings from the ABCD Study.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Review
- The longitudinal structure of cognition in the ABCD study and associations with neural function and psychopathology: A Bayesian probabilistic principal components analysis.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Adolescent music engagement is associated with less alcohol consumption and substance experimentation 5-11 years later: A genetically informative study.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2026Article
- Addictive behaviors among prisoners: neuropsychological perspectives on risk, resilience, and intervention response.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Structural stressors, neurocognition in reward-related decision making and substance use risk in Puerto Rican early adolescents at two sites: study design.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- Facial transplantation in emerging adulthood: characterizing challenges and opportunities to support optimal outcomes.Frontiers in transplantation · 2026Article
- The impact of negative cognitive emotion regulation strategies on impulsive behaviors in middle school students: the mediating effect of cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Multiple dimensions of reward-sensitivity and cognitive control relate to psychopathology: an exploratory structural equation modeling approach.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Frontostriatal Networks Undergo Functional Specialization during Adolescence That Follows a Ventral-Dorsal Gradient: Developmental Trajectories and Longitudinal Associations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The dual systems model of adolescent development asserts that the neurobiological systems underlying reward/motivational processes and cognitive control mature at different rates, resulting in an "imbalance" during adolescence whereby adolescents are biased toward rewards but unable to exert sufficient executive control in risk-taking contexts. While a hypothesized imbalance between these systems is central to the dual systems model, few studies have investigated longitudinal trajectories within and between each system with age. Therefore, this validation study assessed the developmental trajectories of the reward and control systems, and directly quantified within-person differences between these systems using an accelerated longitudinal design, including up to five biennial assessments per participant. The sample included 166 predominately White individuals from middle-class to upper-middle-class backgrounds, aged 9-29 years, of which 54% were female at birth. Results indicate that both self-reported reward sensitivity and laboratory-based executive functions increase rapidly during early adolescence and plateau by early adulthood. Findings provide evidence for a unique period of developmental imbalance with heightened reward sensitivity relative to executive control present in early adolescence and imply that most adolescents demonstrate top-down regulatory control over incentive-reward motivation by mid-to-late adolescence. However, some individuals deviate from this mean-level trend, suggesting that individual differences in neurodevelopment must be considered as important determinants of decision-making in later adolescence. Further research into how developmental differences between reward and control systems relate to decision-making processes, including risk-taking tendencies, is an important future direction for this research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.