ArticleJournal of phycology2025
Isolation and characterization of a spore development mutant in Pyropia yezoensis (Rhodophyta) induced via insertional mutagenesis.
Article in Journal of phycology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electroporation-Mediated Gene Delivery in Pyropia yezoensis (Rhodophyta) Without Cell Wall Removal.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Isolation and characterization of a spore development mutant in Pyropia yezoensis (Rhodophyta) induced via insertional mutagenesis.Journal of phycology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanistic elucidation of spore development is essential for understanding reproductive strategies and improving seaweed cultivation. In this study, we isolated a mutant with spore development defects in Pyropia yezoensis (Rhodophyta) from among genetic transformants generated via insertional mutagenesis. We characterized the mutant phenotype and identified the genomic region containing the mutation. The mutant produced spores (archeospores, zygotospores, and conchospores) at every relevant stage of the life history. No evident differences were observed in the appearance of the released spores at any stage under light microscopy between the wild-type and mutant strains; however, the mutant exhibited a trend of reduced spore release compared with the wild-type. Additionally, the archeospores released by the mutant remained round after being released from the sporangium, failed to adhere to the substratum, did not germinate, and showed no cell wall development after 4 days of standard culture, in contrast to the wild-type. Similar results were observed for the zygotospores and conchospores. These findings indicate that the main characteristic of this mutant was poor spore release, and the released spores failed to germinate. Whole-genome sequencing revealed the introduction of exogenous DNA into the nuclear genome of the mutant and suggested the presence of duplications, deletion, and inversion in the mutant genome. Notably, a deletion of approximately 13 kb was detected in the mutant genome flanking the insertion, and this region contained a plant homeodomain, suggesting that homeodomain-containing proteins may regulate spore development in P. yezoensis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.