ArticleJournal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT2025
Impact of Individual Factors on Exercise Dose During a Walking Intervention in People With Stroke.
Article in Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Is training speed an accurate predictor of who attains a minimal clinically important difference in the six-minute walk test in people with chronic stroke?Topics in stroke rehabilitation · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThere has been a substantial increase in the number of studies demonstrating improvements in walking capacity in people with chronic stroke following moderate-to-high intensity walking exercise interventions. Yet, there is significant variability in response to these interventions. This is likely due to the heterogeneity in this population and the variability in the exercise dose parameters actually attained within these walking interventions. Exercise prescription can be optimized by understanding how individual variables impact walking exercise dose. This study leveraged a large, clinical dataset to classify people with chronic stroke into homogeneous groups (called classes) and compare classes on the walking exercise dose achieved in a walking intervention.
methodsOne hundred sixty-nine people with chronic (>6-Months) stroke completed clinical evaluations and a 12-week high-intensity treadmill intervention. Baseline measures of walking capacity, physical health, and psychosocial factors were used in a latent variable mixture model to assess if latent, homogeneous classes existed within the dataset. Objective criteria determined the optimal number of classes, which were compared to the walking exercise dose attained across the intervention.
resultsFour homogeneous classes were distinguished by differences in baseline walking capacity, steps-per-day, comorbidity burden, and balance self-efficacy. Despite clear "clinical profiles" of people with chronic stroke, these classes did not differ on the walking exercise dose attained. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsPrior literature and clinical intuition suggest individuals with lower baseline walking capacity, physical health, and self-efficacy are less likely to tolerate high-intensity exercise, however our results demonstrate this is not true for people with chronic stroke.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1 available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A524 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.