Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40323604›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

The Primary Care Medical Record Industry in Canada and Its Data Collection and Commercialization Practices.

Sheryl Spithoff, Leslie Vesely, Brenda McPhail, Robyn K Rowe, Lana Mogic, Quinn Grundy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sheryl SpithoffDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Leslie VeselyWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Brenda McPhailFaculty of Social Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Robyn K RoweISAGE (Indigenous Sovereignty, Autonomy, Governance & Ethics), Hanmer, Ontario, Canada.
Lana MogicWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Quinn GrundyLawrence Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Massive volumes of health data flow to commercial data brokers worldwide, yet little empirical research has examined how this industry functions and the implications for patients. Objective: To describe and analyze the primary care medical record industry in Canada and its data collection and commercialization practices. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study of the Canadian primary care health data industry used situational analysis, a grounded theory methodology. Data sources included semistructured interviews of individuals affiliated with the commercial health data industry from May 2022 to May 2023 and publicly available documents. Data were analyzed from May 2022 to May 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Individual semistructured interviews and relevant publicly available documents were analyzed to gain an understanding of data collection and commercialization practices in the primary care record industry. The analysis involved a continuous and iterative process of data collection and analysis, theoretical sampling, data-driven coding, and creation of theoretical concepts. Results: A total of 19 interviews were conducted and 22 documents were sampled. Study participants described the primary care medical record industry in Canada as consisting of complex reciprocal relationships between commercial health data brokers, physicians, for-profit chains of primary care clinics, and pharmaceutical companies. In an emerging vertically integrated business model, the data broker brought the primary care clinics and physicians in house as a clinical subsidiary, thus obtaining more control over clinical practices. Participants understood the primary care medical record industry as having potential to transform patient care, but-because of financial considerations-also tied to pharmaceutical industry interests. According to participants, patients were not involved in decisions related to how their records were collected and used. Conclusions and Relevance: This qualitative study found that each entity within the Canadian primary care medical record industry contributes to, and benefits from, the conversion of patient medical records into commercial assets. The industry's activities reflect the pharmaceutical companies' interests. Patients are notably absent from decision-making; thus, the industry's activities may not reflect their values or interests.

Indexed as

Data CollectionElectronic Health RecordsPrimary Health CareCanadaHumansQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID40323604
PMCPMC12053517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.