Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40323598›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Medicaid Costs and Outcomes for Patients Treated in an Outpatient Telepsychiatry Clinic.

John L Havlik, Reza H Ghomi, Na An, Puneet Budhiraja, Eric R Arzubi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Psychiatric Hospitalization Precipitants and Outcomes in a Comprehensive Dementia Care Program.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John L HavlikDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Reza H GhomiFrontier Psychiatry, Billings, Montana.
Na AnHumbi AI, Nashville, Tennessee.
Puneet BudhirajaHumbi AI, Nashville, Tennessee.
Eric R ArzubiFrontier Psychiatry, Billings, Montana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Evidence of cost savings attributable to indicated and timely care remain rare in psychiatry. Interventions to provide evidence-based psychiatric care to Medicaid patients that lower total costs of care are particularly challenging. Objective: To investigate Medicaid costs and care outcomes associated with use of an outpatient telepsychiatry clinic. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed Medicaid patients using and not using the services of an outpatient telepsychiatry clinic (Frontier Psychiatry, Billings, Montana) in 2022. Data analysis was performed from June to September 2024. Exposure: Receipt of care through an outpatient telepsychiatry clinic. Main Outcomes and Measures: Differences in Medicaid costs and cost subtypes between telepsychiatry patients and controls were assessed. Quality metrics, including inpatient hospitalizations, hospital readmissions, and admissions from the emergency department, were also compared. Results: In total, there were 2686 patients using the outpatient telepsychiatry clinic's services (1665 female [62.0%]; mean [SD] age, 30.55 [14.67] years) and 2686 propensity-matched controls (1665 female [62.0%]; mean [SD] age, 31.37 [15.92] years). Across categories examined, the telepsychiatry patients had care costs per member per month (PMPM) similar to those for propensity-matched control patients ($685.5 [95% CI, $632.9-$738.2] vs $734.0 [95% CI, $645.7-$822.3]; P = .10) over the study period. PMPM costs to Medicaid from the telepsychiatry clinic's patients were higher for professional services vs control patients ($464.0 [95% CI, $443.4-$484.5] vs $388.4 [95% CI, $368.1-$408.7]; P < .001) but were lower for inpatient hospitalization fees ($201.6 [95% CI, $146.2-$228.7] vs $260.6 [95% CI, $220.2-$341.5]; P = .04). Telepsychiatry clinic patients had a 38.0% lower mean annualized hospitalization rate per 1000 patients than controls (274.3 [95% CI, 237.1-311.6] hospitalizations per 1000 patients vs 442.6 [95% CI, 396.5-488.7] hospitalizations per 1000 patients; P < .001) and a 17.9% lower rate of admissions from the emergency department (patients vs controls, 299.7 admissions [47.7%] vs 519.0 admissions [58.1%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of 5372 patients, use of an outpatient telepsychiatry clinic's services was associated with decreases in inpatient hospitalization rates and lower rates of admissions from the emergency department, with similar costs to Medicaid. These findings suggest that outpatient telepsychiatry care could play an important role in reducing hospital admissions among patients enrolled in Medicaid.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareHealth Care CostsMedicaidMental DisordersTelemedicineAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40323598
PMCPMC12053525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.