Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40323567›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology reports2025

Social Needs in Cancer Survivors: A Scoping Review and Future Directions.

Tess Thompson, Meredith Doherty, Julie Berrett-Abebe, Chelsea Brown, Emily Hallgren, Sam Kirk, Rory Weal, Krutika Chauhan, Tamara J Cadet

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tess ThompsonSchool of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 325 Pittsboro St., Campus Chapel Hill, Box 3550, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. tess.thompson@unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3891-8488
Meredith DohertySchool of Social Policy & Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4229-1136
Julie Berrett-AbebeFairfield University, Fairfield University, CT, Fairfield, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8533-3426
Chelsea BrownSchool of Social Policy & Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Emily HallgrenUniversity of Arkansas for the Medical Sciences, Fayetteville, AR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8324-4809
Sam KirkUniversity of Pennsylvania, Penn Libraries, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4051-4308
Rory WealSchool of Social Policy & Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Krutika ChauhanWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Tamara J CadetSchool of Social Policy & Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4660-8009

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Robert H. Vonderheide · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
Dyadic Analysis of Unmet Social Needs Among Breast and Gynecologic Patients and Their Informal CaregiversR37CA277778 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Tess Thompson · 2023 to 2026
$1.3M
Shared decision-making and colorectal cancer screening behaviors among older adults with low health literacyK23AG062795 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CADET, TAMARA J. · 2020 to 2024
$634k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NCI NIH HHS R37 CA277778NIA NIH HHS K23 AG062795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe conducted a scoping review to determine what is known about the prevalence and consequences of unmet social needs in U.S. cancer survivors, what screening tools are used to assess these needs, and what interventions have been developed to meet the needs of cancer survivors.  RECENT

findingsWe identified records from six databases. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed journal articles in English with empirical data from U.S.-based samples of people diagnosed with cancer as adults and assessing one of the following modifiable, individual-level needs commonly included in clinical screening: food insecurity, financial hardship, utility assistance, employment, housing, transportation, or personal safety. The search yielded 11,074 abstracts; 543 records underwent full-text review, and 189 were retained for data extraction. Most studies were quantitative and observational (88%), not based on theory (88%), and cross-sectional (87%). The majority addressed financial toxicity, commonly evaluated using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST). Fewer studies focused on food insecurity, transportation barriers, housing concerns, personal safety, or utility assistance. Included studies reported that financial toxicity and other social needs were negatively associated with health-related quality of life, mental health, and adherence to care.  Financial toxicity is now a well-established challenge for cancer patients, which suggests financial interventions may be widely beneficial. Future work is needed to develop a fuller picture of cancer survivors' other social needs, and to understand and address the impact of unmet social needs on clinical, health, and psychosocial outcomes.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsHealth Services Needs and DemandNeoplasmsFood InsecurityHumansQuality of LifeCancerFinancial toxicityOncologyScoping reviewSocial determinants of healthSocial needs

Identifiers

PMID40323567
PMCPMC12451746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.