Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40323565›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2025

Developing a machine learning-based prediction model for postinduction hypotension.

Maksim Katsin, Maxim Glebov, Haim Berkenstadt, Dina Orkin, Yotam Portnoy, Adi Shuchami, Amit Yaniv-Rosenfeld, Teddy Lazebnik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maksim KatsinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sheba Medical Center, 21 Emek Dotan 11, Ramat Gan, Israel. katinml@gmail.com.
Maxim GlebovDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sheba Medical Center, 21 Emek Dotan 11, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Haim BerkenstadtDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sheba Medical Center, 21 Emek Dotan 11, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Dina OrkinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sheba Medical Center, 21 Emek Dotan 11, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Yotam PortnoyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sheba Medical Center, 21 Emek Dotan 11, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Adi ShuchamiDepartment of Mathematics, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Amit Yaniv-RosenfeldFaculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Teddy LazebnikDepartment of Mathematics, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arterial hypotension is a common and often unintended event during surgery under general anesthesia, associated with increased postoperative complications, such as kidney injury, myocardial injury, and stroke. Postinduction hypotension (PIH) is influenced by patient-specific factors, chronic medication use, and anesthetic induction regimens. Traditional predictive models struggle with this complexity, making machine learning (ML) a promising alternative due to its ability to handle complex datasets and identify hidden patterns. This study aimed to develop and validate an ML-based model for predicting PIH and identifying key clinical predictors. A retrospective cohort study of 20,309 adult patients undergoing non-obstetric surgery under general anesthesia with intravenous induction was conducted. The primary outcome was the occurrence of PIH, defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 55 mmHg within 10 min post-induction. Data were split into training and validation sets using k-fold cross-validation. The model's predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and feature importance was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. PIH occurred in 4,948 patients (24.4%). Key predictors included preinduction systolic and mean arterial pressures, propofol dose, and beta-blocker use. The ML model achieved an AUC of 0.732 in predicting PIH. The ML-based model demonstrated significant predictive capability for PIH, identifying key clinical predictors. This model holds the potential for improving preoperative planning and patient risk stratification. However, further validation through prospective studies is necessary to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

HypotensionMachine LearningAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAdultAgedAnesthesia, GeneralArea Under CurveArterial PressureBlood PressureFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropofolReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsPropofolMachine learningPostinduction hypotensionPredictive modelingRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40323565
PMCPMC12474600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.