ReviewJapanese journal of radiology2025
Overview of task shifting guidelines in Japan: from radiologists to radiological technologists.
Review in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As one of the key pillars of work style reform for physicians, task shifting and sharing from radiologists to radiological technologists has been considered. In May 2021, the Radiological Technologists Act was amended, allowing for the expansion of several duties. Alongside these legal and regulatory changes, a notice from Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare was issued, highlighting tasks to be particularly promoted under the current system prior to the amendment of the Radiological Technologists Act. These amendments authorize radiological technologists to perform advanced and specialized tasks, such as securing venous access for contrast agent administration, which require significantly higher skill levels than their traditional roles. However, the amended legislation did not include specific guidelines, rules, or considerations for the practical implementation of these new duties in daily medical practice, especially from the perspectives of patient safety and quality of care. To address this, the Japan Radiological Society, the Japanese College of Radiology, and the Japan Association of Radiological Technologists collaborated with other related societies to develop guidelines on five key topics:-Guidelines for Safe Conduct of CT/MRI Contrast-Enhanced Examinations: Considering the expanded scope of practice for radiological technologists. -Guidelines for Safe Conduct of Nuclear Medicine Examinations: Aligned with the expanded responsibilities of radiological technologists. -Guidelines for Clinical application of Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT). -Guidelines for Safe Conduct of Angiography and Interventional Radiology (IR): Adapted for the expanded roles of radiological technologists. -Guidelines for Reporting Findings of STAT Imaging: Addressing urgent conditions with potential impact on life prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.