Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40323510›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2025

Arthroscopic and Open Postoperative Hip Capsular Deficiency Management Strategies - A Scoping Review.

Brendan Amoyaw, Bryan Sun, Yoan Bourgeault-Gagnon, Dan Cohen, Axel Öhlin, Corinne Maurice, Olufemi R Ayeni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brendan AmoyawMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Bryan SunDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Yoan Bourgeault-GagnonDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Dan CohenDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Axel ÖhlinDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Corinne MauriceFaculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Olufemi R AyeniDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. ayenif@mcmaster.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis scoping review aimed to identify the indications, techniques, outcomes, and knowledge gaps related to managing postoperative native hip instability. Specifically, it examined how capsular repair and reconstruction strategies address iatrogenic capsular insufficiency following hip preservation procedures, with the goal of clarifying optimal surgical decision-making and guiding future research. RECENT

findingsArthroscopic reconstruction emerged as the most commonly described technique for post-arthroscopic hip instability, frequently involving the use of dermal allografts, iliotibial band, or Achilles tendon grafts. Arthroscopic repair methods (i.e., capsular plication) were also widely reported, showing improved patient-reported outcomes in case series and retrospective cohorts. Open reconstruction and repair approaches were less common but demonstrated comparable potential for restoring hip stability in select patients. Postoperative protocols emphasized restricted weight-bearing, bracing, and controlled rehabilitation to prevent excessive capsular strain. Despite promising clinical improvements, published data were predominantly case reports, technical notes, and small retrospective studies. Instability should be carefully considered and properly assessed in patients experiencing persistent pain and sensations of abnormal hip "looseness" or locking following hip arthroscopy. Capsular repair and reconstruction are viable interventions for addressing hip capsular deficiency and alleviating symptoms of iatrogenic instability. In the absence of high-quality comparative trials, no definitive consensus exists on optimal graft selection or surgical technique, although dermal allografts and iliotibial band constructs have both shown positive outcomes. Larger, prospective and/or comparative studies are needed to refine patient selection, establish standardized protocols, and evaluate long-term efficacy.

Indexed as

Capsular insufficiencyHip arthroscopyHip capsular deficiencyHip capsular reconstructionHip microinstabilityIatrogenic hip instability

Identifiers

PMID40323510
PMCPMC12361014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.