SynthesisAmino acids2025
Safety assessment of L-ornithine oral intake in healthy subjects: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Amino acids, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relevance and Safe Utilization of Amino Acids in Supplements for Human Nutrition: Lessons from Clinical and Preclinical Studies.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Isolation and characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants with ornithine accumulation for value-added craft beer brewing.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
L-Ornithine (L-Orn) is a nonessential amino acid but has many physiological roles. Accordingly, L-Orn has been used as a functional food or dietary supplement to ameliorate various maladies, but there is only limited information available about its safety. The safety of a chemical compound is generally assessed via non-clinical and clinical studies, but safety information derived from human studies is particularly important. Recently, systematic reviews have been used to assess the safety as well as the effectiveness and usefulness of such studies. Therefore, we conducted an assessment of the safety of L-Orn by systematically reviewing clinical studies. Specifically, we performed a comprehensive search of databases for clinical trials in which L-Orn was added to ordinary diets (i.e., orally administered) in healthy individuals. Focusing on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ichushi-Web, and EBSCOhost, we comprehensively searched for reports on human studies on the oral ingestion of L-Orn. We identified 22 articles as subjects for this SR. Among these articles, the maximum L-Orn dose was 14,025 mg/person/day in the form of L-Orn hydrochloride and the maximum duration of administration was 156 days. The main observed adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders. Indexing these adverse events, the no observed adverse effect level was estimated to be 12,000 mg/person/day for L-Orn in the form of L-Orn hydrochloride. When we conducted an integration analysis on the risk of adverse events, the difference between those with and without L-Orn supplementation in the risk of gastrointestinal disorders was 0.00 (95% confidence interval: ±0.02, P = 1.00), so no significant effects were observed. (UMIN000033371).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.