ArticleInternational ophthalmology2025
Adopting machine learning to predict nomogram for small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
Article in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- VISULYZE-assisted nomogram optimization enhances astigmatism correction accuracy in keratorefractive lenticule extraction: a stratified retrospective analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative Validation of a VISULYZE-Based Nomogram for Predicting Visual Outcomes and Higher-Order Aberrations After SMILE in High Myopia.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo predict nomogram for small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using machine learning technology and preoperative clinical data.
methodsA total of 1025 eyes with postoperative spherical equivalent within ± 0.50D after SMILE were included in this study. The XGBoost, gradient boosting regression (GBR), random forest (RF), LightGBM, linear regression (LR) and support vector regression (SVR) were applied to predict the nomogram. The performance of six machine learning methods was assessed by calculating the root mean absolute error (RMSE) and the mean absolute error (MAE). Four junior residents were selected to design the nomogram based on preoperative clinical data in testing set, and were compared with the machine learning models by calculating the accuracy of eyes within three specific thresholds (± 0.05D, ± 0.15D, ± 0.25D).
resultsThe actual nomogram was not significantly different from the nomogram predicted machine learning methods (P > 0.05). The RMSE of six models ranged from 0.075 to 0.110, and MAE were 0.055 to 0.085 on nomogram prediction. The XGBoost provided significantly higher accuracy within 0.05 to 0.25 D than the SVR and junior residents (McNemar test, P < 0.001). However, there were no statistically significant differences in accuracy within 0.05 to 0.25 D that the XGBoost, GBR, RF, LightGBM, and LR achieved (P > 0.05).
conclusionsMachine learning of the preoperative clinical data could accurately predict nomogram for SMILE. The machine learning methods may assist the refractive surgeons and shorten the learning curve of junior residents while making the nomogram adjustment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40323465What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.