Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40323465›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2025

Adopting machine learning to predict nomogram for small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Pan Liu, Xiaochen Gu, Yexuan Jiao, Xinqi Ye, Yu-Hang Zhou, Xinlin Wang, Yongjin Zhou, Zhengbo Shao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pan Liu *Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China.
Xiaochen Gu *Health Science Center, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Yexuan JiaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China.
Xinqi YeDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China.
Yu-Hang ZhouDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China.
Xinlin WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China.
Yongjin ZhouHealth Science Center, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China. yjzhou@szu.edu.cn.
Zhengbo ShaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China. shaozhengbohmu@126.com.

Funding

Doctoral Research Fund of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University BS2013-08Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Scientific Research Developmental Fund LBH-Q18082Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Harbin Medical University YJSCX2020102HYD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo predict nomogram for small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using machine learning technology and preoperative clinical data.

methodsA total of 1025 eyes with postoperative spherical equivalent within ± 0.50D after SMILE were included in this study. The XGBoost, gradient boosting regression (GBR), random forest (RF), LightGBM, linear regression (LR) and support vector regression (SVR) were applied to predict the nomogram. The performance of six machine learning methods was assessed by calculating the root mean absolute error (RMSE) and the mean absolute error (MAE). Four junior residents were selected to design the nomogram based on preoperative clinical data in testing set, and were compared with the machine learning models by calculating the accuracy of eyes within three specific thresholds (± 0.05D, ± 0.15D, ± 0.25D).

resultsThe actual nomogram was not significantly different from the nomogram predicted machine learning methods (P > 0.05). The RMSE of six models ranged from 0.075 to 0.110, and MAE were 0.055 to 0.085 on nomogram prediction. The XGBoost provided significantly higher accuracy within 0.05 to 0.25 D than the SVR and junior residents (McNemar test, P < 0.001). However, there were no statistically significant differences in accuracy within 0.05 to 0.25 D that the XGBoost, GBR, RF, LightGBM, and LR achieved (P > 0.05).

conclusionsMachine learning of the preoperative clinical data could accurately predict nomogram for SMILE. The machine learning methods may assist the refractive surgeons and shorten the learning curve of junior residents while making the nomogram adjustment.

Indexed as

Corneal StromaCorneal Surgery, LaserLasers, ExcimerMachine LearningMyopiaNomogramsRefraction, OcularAdultFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesVisual AcuityYoung AdultMachine learningMyopiaNomogramSmall incision lenticule extraction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.