ArticlePediatric radiology2025
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of PSMA/FAPI Bispecific Tracer ¹⁸F-ALF-NOTA-PSFA-1 and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the Detection of Primary Clear Cell Sarcoma of Bone.Clinical nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Reply to Littooij AS.Pediatric radiology · 2025Article
- 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in pediatric renal tumors: reply to Sun et al.Pediatric radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClear cell sarcoma of the kidney is a rare primary renal malignancy in children and its differentiation from other renal tumors, particularly Wilms' tumor, poses significant diagnostic challenges. Notably, clear cell sarcoma of the kidney is associated with a poorer prognosis than Wilms' tumor, making the preoperative presumptive diagnosis critical for optimizing surgical resection and appropriate chemotherapy regimens.
objectiveWe conducted a feasibility study to evaluate the diagnostic utility of MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study included 19 patients diagnosed with clear cell sarcoma of the kidney and 84 patients with Wilms' tumor. Among these, 11/19 patients with clear cell sarcoma of the kidney and 28/84 patients of Wilms' tumor displayed positive findings on
resultsThe mean SUVmax for all lesions of clear cell sarcoma of the kidney was significantly lower than that of Wilms' tumors (3.9 vs. 7.4; P<0.001). When analyzed separately, primary lesions (3.6 vs. 6.6; P=0.042) and metastatic lesions (4.0 vs. 7.8; P=0.011) both had lower SUVmax in clear cell sarcomas of the kidney compared with Wilms' tumors. ROC curve analysis revealed a cutoff SUVmax of 4.3, which effectively supported the diagnosis of clear cell sarcoma of the kidney over Wilms' tumor, with a sensitivity of 75.0% and a specificity of 87.5%.
conclusionsClear cell sarcomas of the kidney exhibited a significantly lower SUVmax on
Indexed as
Identifiers
40323439What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.