ReviewWorld journal of urology2025
An updated review of stone management in patients with bladder exstrophy.
Review in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAfter complex reconstruction, bladder exstrophy requires unique considerations for long-term surveillance that may arise through the natural history of the condition. A known long-term risk in exstrophy patients is urolithiasis which is a challenge to both treat, and prevent. The authors sought to provide an updated review on the management, prevention, and available interventions in the exstrophy patient population.
methodsA literature review was performed through PubMed database, maintained by the United States National Library of Medicine (USNLM) at the National Institutes of Health to survey the existing body knowledge. After rigorous review, those articles included were synthesized in a concise fashion.
results151 articles were initially identified that covered "stones in exstrophy." After careful review, 54 were excluded leaving 97 articles included in the final analysis. These articles were then crafted to answer for key questions pertaining to workup, techniques for intervention, and mitigation measures.
conclusionExstrophy patients are at an increased risk for urolithiasis given several factors ranging from metabolic derangements secondary to augmentation cystoplasty and relatively increased urinary stasis. Increased volume of irrigation and adjuncts in irrigation materials may be used to minimize future stone formation. Ultimately, if stone intervention is required, there are growing options available to the reconstructive urologist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40323437What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.